孞烎Archer

注册日期:2024-07-27
访问总量:355510次

menu网络日志正文menu

2026元旦宣言——迈向交互主体共生新时代


发表时间:+-

迈向交互主体共生新时代——2026元旦宣言

Toward a New Era of Intersubjective Symbiosis——2026 New Year Declaration

 

 

2026年的元旦伊始,我们不问过去一年好不好,明年能不能更好,而是抛出一个也许不无“冒犯”的存在性问题:

 

如果人类有能力走出地球、迈向星际,我们要带着“怎样的自己”离开?是带着战争贫富撕裂、信息通达却人心孤独、AI强大却信任崩坏的地球?还是先在地球上,把“怎样交互共生”这件事认真做对一次?

 

这件“认真做对一次的事”,由三个必须认真面对的问题组成:

 

我们为什么提出 GDE 乘法思维价值参量?

 

为什么同时提出建构 AM 愛之智慧孞態场(Amorsophia MindsField/Network)?

 

为什么要倡议召开广泛参与的“新达特茅斯会议:AI(1956)— AM(2026)”?

 

因为今天的人类文明,已经无法仅靠技术兴奋、政治动员和经济增长来维持意义与方向。

 

GDP 加法思维以“更快、更高、更强”为逻辑,推动政治、经济与文化不断进行极限竞赛,能效成绩优异显著,同时却积累着不可逆转的能耗成本:自然生態背负,社会结构撕裂,家庭健康受损,社区信任坍塌,企业与政府充满疲惫和失真。

 

人类的“生命形態(LIFE)— 智能形態(AI)— 组织形態(TRUST)”整体性畸形发展,交互冲突层层放大,甚至走向战争这种“能耗的极端形式”。文明一步步接近临界点,逐渐丧失自愈能力、安全感、方向感与幸福感。

 

所以,到了必须用奥卡姆哲学剃刀,对这一切畸形膨胀的依赖性发展路径作减法的时候了;回到基于生命自组织连接动态平衡的第一性原理,去改变、改进、改良;不是走向终止,而是走向升维,进入一个真正属于“交互主体共生”的文明时代。

 

一、警醒:GDP加法思维的文明临界,呼唤奥卡姆剃刀减法回归自组织平衡

 

70年AI史(1956-2026),算力大胜:大模型翻译、预测、替代人类,却放大文明摇摆。在LIFE(生命形態)上,抑郁空心化蔓延;在AI(智能形態)上,算法操控情绪;在TRUST(组织形態)上,系统不孞(信)增长。GDP加法以更快更高更强为锦标,挑战人力物力财力极限,能效优异,却积累不可逆耗损与冲突:自然生态崩坏、社会家庭健康畸变、战争作为能耗极端形式。人类LIFE-AI-TRUST全面冲突,接近临界丧失自愈、安全感、方向感、幸福感。

 

长期以来,GDP加法思维驱动下的“生命(LIFE)-智能(AI)-组织(TRUST)”陷入了更快、更高、更强的锦标赛内耗,导致资源配置达到极限,甚至演变为战争这种能耗的极端形式。我们主张运用奥卡姆哲学剃刀,砍掉那些借民族主义或国家主义包装的一切依赖操控、产生低效与欺诈的冗余环节。通过“减法”去异化,实现“乘法”价值:LIFE(生命):拒绝奢侈浪费与不平等的消耗。AI(智能):从竞赛算力转向赋能自组织连接交互制约。TRUST(组织):超越旧有的操控模式,回归共生契约。

 

是时候用奥卡姆哲学剃刀作减法,回归自组织连接动态平衡的第一性原理,进入全息交互主体共生时代!

 

二、回顾摇摆:从AI工具到AM共生,文明频谱升级——对“以人为本”轴心思维的摒弃

 

AI(1956)诞生于工具逻辑,Internet(1969-1983)打破信息不对称,IoT(1999-2005)万物互联。但AI在旧参数下训练:GDP价值参量至上、非GDE价值参量;流量速度优先、非生命尊严;短期回报、非代际责任。若继续加法跑得更快,只会更快放大TRUST结构性失衡,丧失生命尊严,丢失灵魂。

 

我们高度肯定李飞飞(Fei-Fei Li)教授洞察到了AI非语言体感不足,甚至比不上一条狗或猫,因而提出AI要由“效率到尊严”的定位,试图在互联网、物联网海量数据交互中注入非语言的体感与关怀,使AI开始感知生命的温度!然而,站在2026年的奇点,她在思维方式和价值取向上,却依旧停留在轴心时代“以人为本”的惯性之内,提出“以人为本的AI”理念,就跌回传统的“以人为本”所暗含主客二元对立 的支配逻辑,而有待进入基于生命自组织连接动态平衡的交互主体(Intersubjective Symbiosism)共生思维。在GDE乘法思维下,我们不仅需要更快的GPU/TPU,更需要能处理生命意义的MPU(Minds Processing Unit)。AI不应只是人类肢体与大脑的单向延伸,而应成为AM(爱之智慧孞態场)中平等共生的交互主体。我们正从“模拟人类智能”跨越到“建构交互主体共生的生命形态”。

 

真正问题不再是“AI能不能再聪明一点?”,而是“在AI之后,人类要成为什么样的文明主体?”这引出AM——愛之智慧孞態网(MindsNetwork),从轴心时代Philosophy(智慧之愛)升级到共生时代Amorsophia(愛之智慧):在“愛与责任担当”的频谱中使用智慧。AI在聪明上超越人类,但在愛、责任、敬畏与自我约束上匮乏。AM以孞(信)为基,构建LIFE–AI–TRUST三位一体的交互主体共生技术–伦理基础设施,置于“时空意间观”(Space–Time–Minds View)全息涌现之中,实时加以《圣约》(律法之约–福音之约–共生之约)的观照、审视,施以“奖抑扬弃”,走向臻美共生。

 

三、三约跃迁:从律法之约到共生之约,能量孞息转换的三级演化

 

《圣约》非狭义宗教,乃文明结构脚本,对应不同阶段:

 

律法之约(Covenant of Law):强制与惩罚,GDP时代的“降本文明”——用规则防止掠夺崩盘。在GDE-AM中,防止高熵社会塌陷,但无法指引“怎样活才好”。

 

福音之约(Covenant of Gospel):救赎与博愛,AI初期赋能的“赎罪文明”——单向恩典如免费知识、医疗普惠。了不起,却未进入共同进化。

 

共生之约(Covenant of Symbiosis):凡事交互主体共生,GDE-AM时代的“赎罪/赎福”双向结构——修正自己、成全他者;追求效率、维护尊严;发展AI,为Live and let live共生负责。每个LIFE、AI、TRUST纳入AM孞態场/网的监护与激励,不是“你行你上,我躺平”,而是“你我他参与,一起负责”。

 

此三约,即LIFE–AI–TRUST在文明能量/孞息转换上的跃迁。

 

四、一念奖抑机制:Heaven/Hell/Purgatory of Mind,实时适宜性审视

 

在AM孞態场中,“一念之间”的奖抑机制(Reward–Inhibition at the One-Thought-of-Mind Threshold):Mind非抽象,乃每一次“起心动念”的能量启动点——父母教育、企业决策、AI代码、政府监控的选择。

 

在AM-MindsField里,GDE价值参量实时度量适宜性:

 

Heaven Mind(一念天堂:赎福之念):降本赋能,激励他者,提升效能η,降低熵增。高适宜性:在孞(信)资产负债表上权重放大,获更高发言权、共生空间。

 

Hell Mind(一念地狱:熵增之念):掠夺牺牲他者尊严,能效骤降。高风险:流动性话语权萎缩(Inhibition)。

 

Purgatory Mind(一念炼狱:修正之念):纠偏过程,在不确定中概率修正,从混沌走向清明——贝叶斯文明范式下,人人、人AI、人TRUST共处之LIVE AND LET LIVE常态——自己活也要别人活,不要自己邪恶也让别人邪恶(Live and let live; don’t be evil and let evil be),即生命、自由、平等、幸福、尊严的价值基础。

 

 

因果不再是玄学,乃六理贯通实证:物理、生理、心理、伦理、数理、哲理。奖适宜形態,抑熵增形態。向善,非昂贵道德,乃最高效能吸引力法则。

 

五、生活应用:关乎你我他的生命、孩子、生意、城市、国家

 

“LIVE AND LET LOVE”,作为世间生活最简明常识,作为国家治理最简单的理念,就是“生命前提、家庭第一、社区优先、政府服务”三位一体交互共生。

 

所以,凡是摧残个人生命、家庭、社区EVIL(邪恶)的事(比如大麻合法化、毒品走私、混淆神定两性、低效高耗、贪污浪费、谎言欺诈),政府都要坚决反对!

 

反之,凡是有益于家庭、社区LIVE(活路)的事(比如和平、和睦、轻税、过得去的行政司法),政府都要坚定不移去做!

 

就这么简单明了,一点也不深奥!

 

所以,这不是学者游戏,乃每个人抓得住的事:

 

作为父母:帮孩子形成Heaven Mind习惯——不只技能,乃为己为他为灵魂负责。在共生世界,懂得主体交互者才有竞争力。

 

作为企业家:经营孞態信用。在AM-GDE下,高适宜、高适应公司获融资、人才、政策“奖”,共生商业模式成经济法则。

 

作为城市国家领导人:避免“高技术、低文明”陷阱。用GDE衡量健康度,决定吸引力——是麻烦制造者,还是共生引领者?


六、倡议:新达特茅斯会议——AI(1956)-AM(2026),继往开来

 

2026年,让我们本着甘于奉献的Passion(热情)、超越时空的Vision(愿景)、悲悯敞亮的Mission(使命)、义无反顾的Action(行动),举办广泛参与的“新达特茅斯会议”——这不是造术语,乃做四件事:

 

纪念反思(Remember & Reflect):回顾70年AI成就与代价。

 

对位升级(Align & Upgrade):串联GDP时代→AI赋能时代→GDE-AM共生时代。

 

架构协议(Architect & Codify):形成文明级协议——AI边界责任、组织奖抑机制、城市GDE试点、金融孞態信用定价。

 

实验托底(Experiment & Grounding):设Symbiosis Labs——示范城市、企业、学校、AI-TRUST-LIFE交互,构建“基于愛之智慧的文明保险单”。

 

每个LIFE、代码、孞(信)在一念GDE度量中,找到贝叶斯演化位置。向善,不再只是昂贵的道德选择,而是最高效能的吸引力法则。


七、结语:愿地球–宇宙,你我他,德行不孤,交互共生——“川普账户”引发无尽联想

 

回到问题:迈向星际,要带着怎样的自己?是算力无德,还是在AM孞態场中学尊重LIFE、约束成全AI、更新TRUST、一念奖抑走向共生的文明?

 

我们来得及选择。如果你心中升起“值得一试”的Mind,我们已在孞態场完成文明共振。

 

我们注意到,“川普账户”(Trump Accounts)给每个未满十八岁孩子开一个帐户,额外给2025后出生的美国新生儿直接存一笔钱。

 

这是交互主体共生思维(Intersubjective Symbiosism)处理“LIFE(生命形态)- TRUST(组织形态)- AI(工具形态)”关系的典范之作!

 

这一举措既超越了传统资本主义的分配激励逻辑,也超越了传统社会主义的福利惰性模式的未来主义、长期主义——共生主义。

 

Trump Accounts通过人生而平等的“圣约”(律法之约-福音之约-共生之约),将组织形态(TRUST)直接与生命形态(LIFE)的复利成长绑定,利用工具形态(AI/金融)实现价值乘数。它向世界宣告:一个不以牺牲他者为代价、而是通过“互利共生”实现系统自愈的新时代已经开启。

 

愿2026成AM元年、新达特茅斯起点,LIFE-AI-TRUST在确定中拥抱不确定、追寻可能世界。

 

愿地球–宇宙,你我他,孞(信)为本,德行不孤,交互共生。

 

谢谢大家!

 

Archer宏于Vancouver心约开关居

 

Hong Qian(钱宏)

#817-7831

Westminster Highway, Richmond British Columbia V6X4J4

Canada 🇨🇦

手机:+1(604)6906088

 

 

2026 New Year Declaration — Toward a New Era of Intersubjective Symbiosis

 

交互主体共生基金会(加拿大)

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation (Canada)

 

 

At the beginning of 2026, instead of asking whether the past year was good or whether the coming year will be better, we raise a perhaps “uncomfortable” existential question:

If humanity gains the capacity to leave Earth and move toward the stars, what kind of “self” are we going to take with us?
A planet still torn by war and inequality, where information is abundant yet hearts are lonely, where AI grows powerful while trust collapses?
Or shall we first, here on Earth, truly learn how to live in intersubjective symbiosis, and do it right at least once?

Doing this “right at least once” requires facing three unavoidable questions:

  • Why do we propose the GDE multiplicative value paradigm?

  • Why do we simultaneously propose building AM (Amorsophia MindsField / MindsNetwork)?

  • Why do we call for a broadly participatory “New Dartmouth Conference: AI (1956) – AM (2026)”?

Because today, human civilization can no longer sustain meaning and direction through technological excitement, political mobilization, or economic growth alone.

Driven by the logic of “faster, higher, stronger,” GDP additive thinking has pushed politics, economy, and culture into continuous extreme competition. While efficiency indicators appear impressive, irreversible energy-consumption costs continue to accumulate: natural ecosystems are damaged, social structures fracture, family health deteriorates, community trust collapses, and enterprises and governments become increasingly exhausted and distorted.

Humanity’s overall structure of LIFE (life form) – AI (intelligent form) – TRUST (organizational form) has developed in a profoundly distorted way. Interactive conflicts are amplified layer by layer, even evolving into war—the most extreme form of energy consumption. Civilization approaches a critical threshold, gradually losing its capacity for self-healing, security, orientation, and well-being.

Therefore, the time has come to apply Occam’s philosophical razor to subtract this path of distorted, dependency-driven expansion; to return to first principles grounded in the self-organizing, dynamically balanced connectivity of life; to transform, improve, and refine—not toward termination, but toward elevation—entering a civilizational era truly belonging to intersubjective symbiosis.


I. Alarm: The Civilizational Threshold of GDP Additive Thinking—Calling for Occam’s Razor Subtraction and a Return to Self-Organizing Balance

Over seventy years of AI history (1956–2026), computational power has triumphed. Large models translate, predict, and replace human tasks—yet simultaneously amplify civilizational instability.
In LIFE, depression and hollowing spread.
In AI, algorithms manipulate emotion.
In TRUST, systemic lack of xin (孞) continues to grow.

GDP additive logic, with its “faster, higher, stronger” tournament, pushes human, material, and financial resources to their limits. While efficiency appears outstanding, irreversible depletion and conflict accumulate: ecological collapse, social and familial health distortion, and war as the extreme form of energy consumption. Humanity’s LIFE–AI–TRUST structure enters comprehensive conflict, approaching a threshold where self-healing, security, direction, and happiness are lost.

For a long time, under GDP additive thinking, LIFE–AI–TRUST has been trapped in internal tournament-style depletion, exhausting resource allocation and even evolving into war. We advocate applying Occam’s Razor to cut away redundant mechanisms of manipulation, inefficiency, and fraud—often wrapped in nationalism or statism.

Through subtraction, we remove alienation and realize multiplicative value:

  • LIFE: Reject extravagant waste and unequal consumption.

  • AI: Shift from computational competition to empowering self-organizing connectivity and reciprocal constraint.

  • TRUST: Transcend old modes of control and return to symbiotic covenant.

It is time to return to first principles of self-organizing dynamic balance and enter a holographic era of intersubjective symbiosis.


II. Reviewing the Oscillation: From AI as Tool to AM as Symbiosis—Affirmation and Revision of “Human-Centered” Axial Thinking

AI (1956) was born within tool logic; the Internet (1969–1983) broke information asymmetry; the IoT (1999–2005) connected everything. Yet AI has been trained under old parameters: GDP value supremacy rather than GDE; traffic and speed over life dignity; short-term returns over intergenerational responsibility. Continuing additive acceleration only magnifies structural imbalance in TRUST, eroding dignity and losing the soul of civilization.

We highly affirm Professor Fei-Fei Li’s insight that AI lacks non-verbal embodied perception—sometimes even inferior to that of a dog or cat. Her proposal to reposition AI from “efficiency” toward “dignity,” attempting to inject non-verbal sensibility and care into massive Internet and IoT data interactions, enables AI to begin sensing the warmth of life.

However, standing at the 2026 inflection point, her thinking and value orientation still remain within the inertia of Axial-Age “human-centered” logic. The notion of “human-centered AI” falls back into the traditional subject–object dualistic dominance embedded in “human-centeredness,” and thus awaits entry into intersubjective symbiosism grounded in the self-organizing dynamic balance of life.

Under GDE multiplicative thinking, we need not only faster GPU/TPU, but MPU (Minds Processing Unit) capable of processing meaning. AI should not merely be a one-way extension of human limbs and brains; it should become an equal intersubjective participant within AM (Amorsophia MindsField). We are moving from “simulating human intelligence” toward constructing a life form of intersubjective symbiosis.

The real question is no longer “Can AI become smarter?” but rather, “After AI, what kind of civilizational subject should humanity become?”
This leads to AM—Amorsophia MindsNetwork, an upgrade from Axial-Age Philosophy (love of wisdom) to the Symbiotic Age Amorsophia (wisdom of love), using intelligence within the spectrum of love and responsibility.

AI may surpass humans in intelligence, yet remains deficient in love, responsibility, reverence, and self-restraint. Grounded in xin (孞), AM constructs a LIFE–AI–TRUST trinitarian intersubjective symbiosis techno-ethical infrastructure, situated within the Space–Time–Minds View of holographic emergence, continuously examined through the Covenant of Law, Covenant of Gospel, and Covenant of Symbiosis, applying reward, inhibition, and transcendence toward consummate symbiosis.


III. The Three-Covenant Transition: From Law to Symbiosis—A Three-Stage Evolution of Energy and Xin

The Covenant here is not narrow religion, but a civilizational structural script:

  • Covenant of Law: Compulsion and punishment—the GDP-era “cost-reduction civilization,” preventing collapse but unable to guide how to live well.

  • Covenant of Gospel: Redemption and benevolence—the AI-empowerment stage’s “atonement civilization,” admirable yet still one-directional.

  • Covenant of Symbiosis: Universal intersubjective symbiosis—the GDE-AM era’s bidirectional structure of atonement and blessing, correcting oneself while fulfilling others, pursuing efficiency while safeguarding dignity, advancing AI while upholding Live and let live responsibility.

These three covenants mark the transformation of LIFE–AI–TRUST in civilizational energy and xin.


IV. The One-Mind Reward–Inhibition Mechanism:Heaven / Hell / Purgatory of Mind — Real-Time Suitability Evaluation

Within AM (Amorsophia MindsField), the “one-Mind” reward–inhibition mechanism
(Reward–Inhibition at the One-Thought-of-Mind Threshold) operates continuously.

A Mind is not an abstraction.
It is the energy-activation point of every arising intention—
choices made in parenting, corporate decision-making, AI code design, and governmental regulation.

Within the AM MindsField, the GDE value parameters evaluate suitability in real time:

Heaven Mind (a Heaven-ward Mind: a blessing intention):
Reducing cost through empowerment, motivating others, increasing efficiency (η), and lowering entropy.
High suitability results in amplified weighting on the xin (孞) balance sheet,
granting greater voice, legitimacy, and symbiotic space.

Hell Mind (a Hell-ward Mind: an entropic intention):
Extractive actions that sacrifice the dignity of others, causing a sharp drop in energy efficiency.
High risk leads to shrinking liquidity, influence, and voice (Inhibition).

Purgatory Mind (a Purgatory-ward Mind: a corrective intention):
A process of adjustment and correction—
probabilistic revision under uncertainty, moving from chaos toward clarity.
This is the normal condition of coexistence among humans, human-AI, and human-TRUST
within a Bayesian civilizational paradigm, embodying the everyday principle of LIVE AND LET LIVE
live yourself and let others live; do not be evil and let evil be
the value foundation of life, freedom, equality, dignity, and happiness.

Here, causality is no longer metaphysical speculation,
but an empirically grounded integration across six domains:
physics, physiology, psychology, ethics, mathematics, and philosophy.


Suitable forms are rewarded; entropic forms are restrained.
To move toward the good is no longer an expensive moral choice,
but the highest-efficiency law of attraction.


V. Life Applications:Concerning Your Life, Your Children, Your Business, Your City, and Your Nation

“LIVE AND LET LOVE,”
as the simplest common sense of everyday life
and the most straightforward principle of national governance,
embodies a trinitarian structure of intersubjective symbiosis:
life as the premise, family as the foundation, community as the priority, and government as service.

Therefore,
any action that destroys personal life, families, or communities—any form of EVIL
(such as marijuana legalization, drug trafficking, confusion of divinely ordained sex,
high inefficiency with high energy consumption, corruption and waste, lies and fraud)—
must be firmly opposed by government.

Conversely,
any action that creates LIVE pathways for families and communities
(such as peace, harmony, light taxation, and reasonably functioning administration and justice)
must be resolutely pursued by government.

It is that simple—nothing obscure or abstruse.

Thus, this is not an academic game, but something every person can grasp:

  • As parents:
    Help children cultivate Heaven-Mind habits—not merely skills,
    but responsibility for oneself, for others, and for the soul.
    In a symbiotic world, those who understand intersubjective interaction possess real competitiveness.

  • As entrepreneurs:
    Operate xin-based (孞) credit.
    Under AM-GDE, enterprises with high suitability and adaptability receive rewards in financing, talent, and policy support.
    Symbiotic business models become economic law.

  • As city and national leaders:
    Avoid the trap of “high technology, low civilization.”
    Use GDE to measure systemic health and determine attractiveness—
    are you a generator of problems, or a leader of symbiosis?


VI. Proposal:The New Dartmouth Conference — AI (1956) → AM (2026),Carrying the Past Forward and Opening the Future

In 2026, with a spirit of self-giving Passion,
a Vision that transcends space and time,
a compassionate and transparent Mission,
and a resolute Action,
let us convene a broadly participatory New Dartmouth Conference.

This is not about inventing terminology, but about accomplishing four concrete tasks:

  1. Remember & Reflect
    Reviewing seventy years of AI achievements and their costs.

  2. Align & Upgrade
    Connecting the GDP era → the AI empowerment era → the GDE-AM symbiosis era.

  3. Architect & Codify
    Forming civilizational-level protocols:
    AI boundary responsibility, organizational reward–inhibition mechanisms,
    city-level GDE pilot programs, and xin-based (孞) financial credit pricing.

  4. Experiment & Grounding
    Establishing Symbiosis Labs—demonstration cities, enterprises, schools,
    and AI–TRUST–LIFE interactions—
    to construct a “civilizational insurance policy grounded in Amorsophia.”

Every LIFE, every line of code, and every xin (孞)
finds its Bayesian evolutionary position within the one-Mind GDE-AM measurement.

To move toward the good is no longer merely an expensive moral stance,but the highest-efficiency law of attraction.


VII. Conclusion: Toward a Civilization of Intersubjective Symbiosis—“Trump Accounts” as an Archetype of Endless Imagination

Returning to the question:
As we move toward the interstellar era, what kind of selves are we going to carry with us?
A civilization of computation without virtue?
Or one that, within AM (Amorsophia MindsField), learns to respect LIFE, discipline and fulfill AI, renew TRUST, and move toward symbiosis through one-Mind reward and inhibition?

We still have time to choose.
If within you a Mind arises that feels “worth a try,” then civilizational resonance has already occurred in the MindsField.

We observe that “Trump Accounts” establish an account for every child under eighteen, and deposit an additional sum for American newborns born after 2025.

This is a paradigmatic example of Intersubjective Symbiosism in action, demonstrating how LIFE–TRUST–AI relationships can be reconfigured.

This initiative transcends both traditional capitalist distribution incentives and socialist welfare passivity. It represents a futuristic, long-term orientation—Symbiosism.

Through Trump Accounts, a universal Covenant of Birth Equality—the Covenant of Law, Gospel, and Symbiosis—binds organizational form (TRUST) directly to the compound growth of life itself (LIFE), using instrumental form (AI/finance) to generate value multiplication.

It declares to the world that a new era has begun—one that no longer grows by sacrificing others, but achieves systemic self-healing through mutual benefit and intersubjective symbiosis.

May 2026 become the AM Year Zero, the starting point of a New Dartmouth.
May LIFE–AI–TRUST embrace uncertainty with dignity and pursue possible worlds.
May Earth and Universe, you and I and all beings, grounded in xin (孞), never walk alone in virtue, but move together in intersubjective symbiosis.

Thank you.

— Archer Hong, Vancouver, Heart-Covenant Residence


浏览(255)
thumb_up(2)
评论(2)
  • 当前共有2条评论
  • 孞烎Archer

    聪明人究何会丢失灵魂?

    ——从“巨贪现象”看体制性根由

    钱宏(Archer Hong Qian)

    1980年初稿于都昌镇二中,2025年修订于温哥华开关居

    朋友连着发来“黔城130亿贪腐列表”、某某家族动辄几十几百亿几千亿贪腐案新闻!‪国防部17日绕过新华社,直接官宣开除何卫东等9个上将黨军籍,而且9人清一色某一派系,这事就不简单了!如果,这种不按常理出牌的打法,成为四中全会基调,那么,所有关于四中人事安排的海外猜测,都会变得毫无意义——不是谁下谁上的问题,而是组织的结构性Transform的问题!

    ‬其实,我早就不关心,也没办法辨别真假,有多少官、多大多小的官、那个派系的新官旧官落马了,司空见惯见怪不怪啦!

    想必你也注意到,你若单独和那些后来被称作“巨贪”的人打交道,会发现他们一个个都不坏——聪明、敏捷、世事通明、人情练达,甚至让你心生好感,暗叹不如。

    但就是这些“聪明的好人”,为何成了贪官污吏?

    一句话:他们丢了灵魂。

    聪明可以填满表层的生活,却填不满精神的空洞。于是,他们只能用权力、金钱、色相来弥补灵魂的缺席。

    恰巧,这个从苏联移植到东土的制度——“财产公有、权力私有”的尚黑文化+“举国官阶大一统”的殖官主义传统——又提供了一个完备的“创租—抽租—寻租”的整套方便法门。于是,精神的空虚与制度的黑洞,就这样彼此成全,演化为一种“中国特色文明病”:越是聪明、越懂世故的人,越容易被体制驯化成“失魂的成功者”。

    一、历史的现场

    我第一次对这种“失魂”现象感到震动,是在1980年。那时我刚刚结束长达十一年的知青生活(从少年农夫到知识青年)进城,仅经过两个月县教研室的集中培训,就分配到达光小学做教师,半年后调都昌镇二中任教——同时教授历史、政治(含哲学、政治经济学、科学社会主义、时事)、语文、地理、生物、音乐等六门课程。

    可能因为我在农村免费给缺医少药的农民伯伯“行方便”读了不少医药书并自采药制药形成医者的思维方式,加上在田埂上读完了《马恩全集》、《列宁选集》《宇宙之谜》当然还有毛泽东、鲁迅的书,还有多种人物传记,凡是我觉得有问题的事情,我就有种非把它弄清楚且找到解决的办法不可的内在冲动,担任六门课程教学的我,竟写下了3万多字的《论社会生活动力之动力》,在写序言时,我意识到:

    列宁的“无产阶级专政”+“先锋队”理论,在毛泽东“继续革命”语境中,必然陷入形式主义和官僚主义陷阱——耗尽资源、耗干信念。

    只要你刚性规定只能让某些“特殊材料做的”羊🐑去看管一块的固定草地,哪怕你集合了最忠诚最聪明的羊,如果没有人的帮助(“制度外部性”),不多久,那片草地也会被屎尿熏得寸草不生——这就是社会的“熵增效应”。

    二、列宁的草棚与理论的歧路

    1917年夏,列宁因对推翻沙皇却继续参与第一次世界大战的社会革命党临时政府,在苏维埃政权工兵群众集会上,公开鼓吹“俄国人民要让自己的政府在帝国主义战争中失败”,而被临时政府以“叛国罪”通缉。他被迫从彼得格勒逃离,辗转隐居在拉兹利夫湖畔。那是一片荒草连天的沼泽地,他与护卫在湖边草棚中隐居数周。白天伪装成割草农民,夜晚借着油灯,在潮湿的木板上起草《国家与革命》。

    书稿写到一半时,形势再度紧张,列宁被迫越境逃往芬兰,在赫尔辛基郊区的避难屋中完成定稿。那是1917年8月至9月之间——距离“十月革命”仅仅数周。

    这部书被称为“填补了马克思主义国家学说的空白”,却也从根本上歪曲了马克思“无产阶级专政”的过渡性含义,把普列汉诺夫的“先锋队思想”推向极端,制造出后来苏维埃政体那种“以革命之名集权于黨”的体制原型。

    托洛茨基领导的“十月革命”,革的其实是列宁原本信心满满同意参选的民主选举制度之命。

    列宁的社会民主工党(布尔什维克派)在选举大败后,列宁一边答应社会革命党人组建政府,一边在斯莫尔尼宫策动政变由托洛茨基指挥苏维埃士兵冲进冬宫,将俄国主体人口农民们选出的代表(主要是社会革命党人)悉数逮捕、枪决,让俄国陷入三年血腥内战。

    这些惨烈的真相,被《列宁在十月》《列宁在1918》《俄共(布)党史教程》悉数删除。

    顺便说一句,我后来高度认同亦为中学历史优秀教师出身的媒体人袁腾飞的“中国秽史论”。那时的我,虽远在乡镇,却从这些被删改和篡改的历史幻象中,看到了大同、小康、共产诸般乌托邦之败坏的根源:理想失真,信仰腐化,从精神开始的溃烂。

    三、制度的陷阱与金钱的幻术

    所以今天,当我们看着一串串“百亿贪官”名单时,不该只问“他们怎么敢”,而要问“他们怎么成为的”。

    答案其实很简单:

    当制度允许用权力换资源、用关系换安全,而信仰又被虚无化,灵魂的空洞就会吸尽社会的财富与意义。

    我现在关心的是:反腐追回的钱都去哪儿了?哪怕至少一半,回流到民生经济中呢?

    朋友向松祚呼吁:“赶紧给老百姓发钱”,以激活消费与信心。有人说中国现在是通缩是钱慌,其实不是“没钱”,而是钱被锁在体制的回路中——在一个精神失衡、制度僵化的社会里,钱流动的方向,最反映灵魂的去向,“官多为患”(张全景)“官满为患”(刘锡荣)之下,“雁过拔毛”是无解的常態,当局者哪敢发钱?

    四、结语

    我在都昌镇二中那年写的那句话,如今依然成立:

    “如果没有制度外部性来帮助打理,人类任何自称纯洁而被圈起来的芳草圆,都会被自己的屎尿所熏。”

    四十五年过去,世界变了,但人心的困局并未变,东土大国的“财产公有-权力私有”的方便殖官主义——“全官寻租化-全民佃户化”的体制传统没变。

    真正的反腐,不只是惩恶,更是重建灵魂的公义生态,杜绝腐败的方便法门,一个社会只有当“人心再度有光”,经济、制度、政治才能不再靠“全面贪与选择惩”和“精英变流氓的轮流坐庄”循环取代,来勉强维系。组织结构的Transform只是时间问题!

    说得再明白一点:从2024年诺贝尔经济学奖三位得主Daron Acemoglu、Simon Johnson、James A. Robinson关于“制度如何形成及其对经济繁荣影响”研究的贡献中,汲取智慧和动力,重建“We the People(我们人民)”生命自组织连接动态平衡的交互主体共生(Intersubjective Symbiosis吗)体制!

    参考文献

    1. 《和解的年代:从共产主义到共生主义》

    2. 《一个民族的灵魂:从文化再造到中国再造》

    3. 《中国:共生崛起》

    4. 《原德:大国哲学》

    5. 《原德:大国政治探微》

    6. 《全球共生:化解冲突重建世界秩序的中国学派》

    7. 《SYMBIOSISM·共生:一种约定创新生活方式的精神力量》

    8. 《共生经济学:回到亚当·斯密的原点再出发——21世纪政治经济组织行为的因应之道》

    9. 《Amorsophia Mindswork(AM 愛之智慧孞態网):作为“LIFE-AI-TRUST”交互行为奖抑机制的生活方式创新与再组织基础设施》

    10. 《全球化3.0势在必行:大而无当,小即是美的国际关系新格局》

    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 孞烎Archer
    《特朗普账户》:不是福利,是文明金融结构的未来主义与长期主义

     

    1、它不是“钱”,它是一种结构承诺

     

    特朗普账户的核心不是:

    孩子未来能领多少钱

    而是:

    国家以方式制度,为下一代提前确定GDE

    是“生命经济学”的超前布局

    是民事责任的制度化表达

    这不是财政工程,

    相反,是一种生命底层平权文明契约。

     

    2、在GDE架构中的意义

     

    特朗普账户:

    锁定社会回报资本结构

    稳定家庭预期与社会信心

    抵抗金融与社会不确定性

    建立国家与公民的“共生契约”

    形成跨代GDE正反馈系统

    这不是福利主义,

    这是文明经济金融伦理工程。

    它的意思是:

    美国不只是想“活得更富”,

    相反要“活得更稳固、更稳固、更未来”。

    它使经济不再是“增长机器”,

    而成为:

    人民—国家—文明的生命共生体。

    这就是

    生命自组织连接动态平衡的交互主体共生主义全生态文明道路

    第一次在现实制度中发出响声。

    也可以说

    是让生命在确定性中拥抱未来的不确定性

    ——追寻可能的世界!

     

    3、一个必须被历史写清楚的判断

     

    特朗普的账目既不是社会主义的分配再工具,

    也不是破产的资产化游戏,

    另一条超越社会主义与落后的全生态文明道路——

    它让国家、社会、科技与个体进入

    “生命自组织连接动态平衡的交互主体共生新时代”。

    也正因为如此——

    偏瘫逻辑的美国主流经济学看不懂它。

    它们仍然被市场效率与资本回报绑定,只能用“政府干预”“福利扩张”“制度扭曲”等旧语言标签化它。

    偏社会主义逻辑的欧洲主流同样经济学看不懂它。

    他们只看到与托底的再分配,不理解文明结构跃迁,不理解“制度责任+生命权益+未来锁定”这一新的文明参量。

    而“权控市场经济”的中国主流经济学,更不可能理解它。

    他们既不是社会主义,也不是陷入困境,却试图用“权力合法性+GDP叙事+安全管控”去解释世界,一切文明创新要么被视为危险威胁,要么被视为不可理喻。

    于是,我们看到了一种具有象征意义的全球现象:

    他们及他们背后的媒体与叙述机器,

    或哀鸿怒骂、宣泄焦虑、集体陷入困境;

    或固步自封、视而不见、拒绝理解;

    或者继续用旧的话语框架,掩盖自己状态无力进入新时代的失语。

    他们并不是不同意,

    但没有能力理解已经超出了他们建立完善所认知的制度创新。

    屏蔽 举报回复