【白皮书WHITE PAPER】

The Achilles’ Heel of MAGA: A generational gap!

MAGA之踵：青黄不接！

——美国年轻世代例证明显：黎巴嫩、委内瑞拉、缅甸、阿根廷（参考《共生经济学的发生学原理——回到亚当斯密“和平经济学”原点再出发（The Embryological Principles of Symbionomics——Revisiting Adam Smith's Vision of "Peaceconomics" and Starting Again）》http://symbiosism.com.cn/11085.html）。复兴的共生经济金桥

——The Symbionomic Bridge to America’s Young Generation Revival

作者：钱 宏Archer Hong Qian

协作对话：xAI Grok（2025.11.9–11.10 午夜连线）

时间地点：2025年11月10-11日 · 新加坡-马六甲海峡

Ⅰ. 午夜反思 · Midnight Reflection

机器归来，人才未归；工厂复建，工匠不在。美国制造业重启百万岗位，却有 45 — 50 万 岗位无人可用——美国正处于“青黄不接”的断层时刻。

川普政府重建全球供应链，力推产业回归，却发现年轻世代已无力接盘。
三十年政治正确教育、二十年产业空洞化、十五年福利社会，教授老化、学生被洗脑、社会结构严重失衡，使年轻一代：

啃政府（啃纳税人，比中式“啃老”更糟）、啃社会，失自尊心；
不劳而获，成天经地义；
肥胖懒惰，却焦虑不安。

参看社会心理学家乔纳森·海特 (Jonathan Haidt) ：《失控的焦虑世代》 (The Anxious Generation) 。

结症：滋生选举话术共产主义（即美国式民主社会主义）的温床——美国再次伟大之踵（The Achilles’ Heel of MAGA）！

纽约市长选举便是一面镜子：

民主党赢了选举，却丢了灵魂；
共和党有信仰，却失去社区触角；
MAGA（Make America Great Again）与 MAHA（Make America Healthy Again）
尚未触及“州、市、社区”的生命神经。

对比中国大陆的制度演化更清楚地揭示了文明断层的代价：

前三十年，靠“非农户口”吃“商品粮”，啃“农业户口”，强征“公余粮”，“向苏联一边倒”获得156个工业项目，建立基本工业布局；
后四十年，部分靠“向美国一边倒”，权力与资本勾兑，获“最惠国待遇”“普惠制”与“低人权劳工”“高能耗资源掠取”，换取畸形增长。

结症有三：1、年轻世代上升通道被堵死、社会资源被体制内部“自己人”占据；2、冗官、冗兵、冗费，政府、企业“资不抵债”；3、转而向贡献“56789”（5.3%经济增长率、6.4%GDP 增长贡献率、7.4%就业贡献率、8.4%税收贡献率以及9.6%的研发投入比例）非“自己人”的民营经济，进行勒索、打压。

中美的共同问题，是各自“政治正确”的教育错位：

中国改革： 成也普及教育，败也缺乏自由理性，创造力缺失；

美国改变： 成也自由教育，败也失去职业技能，再分配依赖。

川普提出的 MAGA（Make America Great Again），并非孤立的竞选口号，而是提醒每个国家政府都必须首先对本国人民负责。这正是 MAGA–MAHA（Make America Great & Healthy Again） 的共生精神：责任政府，健康国民。

Figure 1. MAGA–MAHA–GDE：从责任政府到全民健康的共生路径（The Symbiotic Path from Responsible Government to National Health）

说明 / Annotation：从川普提出的 MAGA 到 MAHA ，再到共生经济学 GDE （Gross Domestic Efficiency）的价值演化逻辑。它揭示了“责任政府—健康国民—共生文明”的结构级跃迁：政治责任 → 生命健康 → 文明共生。

政府的职责，不仅是让经济增长，更是人民葆有身心灵健康、社会重拾生命尊严。

美国的问题，不只是经济空心化，而是年轻世代精神体能的断层化；“再伟大”的前提，不只是技术创新和产业回归，而是代际传承的健康复原：

拆除“选举话术共产主义”（美式民主社会主义）温床的同时，回归亚当·斯密经济繁荣三原素。

Ⅱ. 拆除“选举话术共产主义”温床——美国福利政治的软极权循环

Dismantling the “Electoral Rhetorical Communism” — The Soft Totalitarian Cycle of Welfare Politics

美国正在陷入一种隐性的新型极权模式——选举话术共产主（Electoral Rhetorical Communism），专指选举周期中以“免费/补贴/保障”话术换选票的机制，适用于“福利→选票”循环描述，这种“选举话术共产主义”的本质，是将情绪政治许诺包装成道德救赎，换取选票后留下一地财政鸡毛或强征暴敛。

这是一种在民主外衣下运行的“施舍政治”：

福利→选票→赤字→焦虑 的循环，使“索取者”取代“创造者”，“再分配”取代“再创造”。

总之，所谓“选举话术共产主义”即美式民主社会主义，是指以‘福利—焦虑—依赖—选票’的制度循环，将善意政治演化为财政绑架与精神依附的民主异化现象。

Ⅱ-1选举话术共产主义温床的形成

政治温床的滋生与文明失衡，从福利到选票：温床的政治演化。

当社会长期处于“高成本、低机会、低信任”状态，民众特别是年轻世代的政治心理诉求，会自然从“创造者”转向“索取者”。

在这种结构中，任何能迅速承诺“减负”“补贴”“免费”的政治话语，都会被视为“救赎性言语”，不论其财政或产业后果如何。于是，一个新的政治循环形成：

痛点制造 → 福利承诺 → 选票回报 → 财政赤字 → 再次痛点

这正是选举话术共产主义（美式民主社会主义幻象），在情绪政治孳生的社会机制。它不是意识形态的输入，而是结构性焦虑的反射。

当焦虑成为主要的政治能源，“再分配”便取代了“再创造”，而政治语言也从“如何生产”退化为“如何分配”（参考钱宏著：《和解的年代：从共产主义到共生主义》，香港新文化图书出版公司，2007）

Ⅱ-2 政治演化：从福利到选票的恶性循环

    A[高成本·低机会·低信任] --> B[民众心理：创造者 → 索取者]

    B --> C[救赎性言语：补贴、免费、保障]

    C --> D[选票回报]

    D --> E[财政赤字 ↑]

    E --> F[再次痛点]

    F --> C

    style C fill:#ff4d4d,stroke:#333

数据警示：

2024年，全美 1/3 家庭依赖至少一项联邦福利（Census Bureau）。

青年劳动参与率（16–24岁）仅 56.2%，创 50 年新低（BLS）。

身份政治议题在中期选举广告中占比 42%（Wesleyan Media Project）。

这是一种“软极权”机制：好意 × 焦虑 × 依赖 = 合法索取权。

Ⅱ-3 社会断层病灶交叠

这三层交叠，形成了制度性温床：

一个“由好意驱动、由焦虑维系、由依赖延续”的软极权生态。

它的危险在于：剥夺了创造的意志，却留下了索取的合法性。

Ⅱ-4 根治之道：从“施舍政治”到“赋能文明”

拆除选举话术共产主义（美式民主社会主义）温床的文明工程：

从施舍政治（Politics of Benevolence）转为赋能文明（Civilization of Empowerment）。

三大系统转化路径：

从再分配到再创造——政策语言中，“补贴”“免费”“保障”应逐步让位于“技能”“创新”“自立”；政府的角色从“供养者”转为“赋能者”。

从身份动员到责任动员——政治叙事的焦点应从“谁被伤害”转为“谁能贡献”。以责任重新定义平权：平等的起点，不等于免于努力的权利。

从情绪选举到结构修复——防止短期民粹动员，建立跨代共识机制。

将教育、产业、社区、家庭、体能健康五维一体，作为国家繁荣的战略工程，而非临时政策。只有当产业能吸纳、教育能赋能、家庭能育能、体能能支撑，政治才不再需要靠“施舍性承诺”来维系合法性。

这就意味着，21世纪的“We the People”要拆除这种“软极权”的温床，还得回到亚当·斯密所揭示的三原素——和平、低税、公义——以创造代替索取，以共生取代对抗。

Ⅲ. 亚当·斯密的国家繁荣原点与川普总统的实践回归

Adam Smith’s Point of Origin and Trump’s Return to the Natural Law of Prosperity

早在1755年的手稿中，亚当·斯密提出了财富增长的三个原素：

“除了和平、轻税，以及过得去的司法（peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice）之外，把一个落后国家变成繁荣的国家，就不再需要别的什么了。”

“除了和平、低税收，以及过得去的司法之外，把一个落后国家变成繁荣的国家，就不再需要别的什么了。”（ Little else is required to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism,but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice.）

反过来说，把一个繁荣国家变成野蛮、落后国家，就是Peace, Easy Taxes, Justice“三原素”的反面：战乱（冲突）、重税、司法不公。

川普经济哲学和实践，正是对斯密“三原素”的现代回归——在全球化2.0的制度错位与青年断层背景下，他用“降本赋能”的政策复兴“和平—低税—公正”的自然繁荣秩序。

Figure 2. 从亚当·斯密“三原素”到川普的GDE共生模型（From Adam Smith’s “Three Elements of Prosperity” to Trump’s GDE Symbiotic Model）

说明 / Annotation：川普通过“降本×赋能”的政策实践，如何将亚当·斯密的“和平—低税—公正”三原素，演化为现代共生经济学的五因交互模型（C–E–H–T–P），完成从“道德情操→市场秩序→共生效率”的文明循环。

Ⅳ. 以降本赋能为前提的再分配：川普共生经济逻辑

Redistribution Based on Cost-Reduction Empowerment: Trump’s Symbionomic Logic through the “Big and Beautiful Act”

Ⅳ-1. 创造先行：再分配的生命源

Creation First: The Living Source of Redistribution

真正的再分配应以创造为前提。

只有当社会持续激发出真实的创造力——劳动、技术、创新、精神、做人的尊严——再分配才具备生命来源；否则，分配便沦为对既有财富的掠夺，而非对创造价值和弱势群体的反馈。

再分配不是慈善，而是对创造和人性的尊重。

因此，共生经济学强调：

以降本赋能为前提的再分配，即以创造为前提的再分配。

社会健康的循环路径应是：

创造 → 降本 → 赋能 → 再分配 → 再创造。

Ⅳ-2. 政府的角色：从“再分配者”到“共生成长的助产士”

The Government’s Role: From a Redistributor to a Midwife of Co-Growth

传统政府视自己为资源再分配者（Redistributor），财富流转依赖行政权与财政调度。

但在共生经济学视角下，政府应是“共生成长的助产士（Midwife of Co-Growth）”，即创造的催化者与制度平衡的协调者。

对应 GDE 五因模型：

C × E → H × T → P

政府通过 C（降本）与 E（赋能）的结构性设计，催生 H（健康）与 T（信任） 的社会结果，最终实现 P（和平共生）。

政府不是财富的主人，而是创造的催化剂；再分配也不是奖惩，而是生命的反馈。

Ⅳ-3. 《大而美法案》：共生创造的范例

The Big and Beautiful Act: A Paradigm of Symbiotic Creation

《大而美法案》（The Big and Beautiful Act）是川普经济哲学的象征。
这部法案不是“大政府建设”的延伸，而是一场结构性降本 + 创造性赋能的实践革命。

“We will rebuild America beautifully, not bureaucratically.”
——Donald J. Trump

Figure 3. 健康黄金律：MAGA 框架下的 GDE 价值参量（The Golden Rule of Health: GDE Value Parameters within the MAGA Framework）

降本 (C↓) → 赋能 (E↑) → 健康 (H↑) → 信任 (T↑) → 和平 (P↑)

Cost Reduction → Empowerment → Health → Trust → Peace

公式 / Equation：

GDE=f(C,E,H,T,P)GDE = f(C, E, H, T, P)GDE=f(C,E,H,T,P)

核心说明 / Core Statement：“以降本赋能为前提的再分配，以健康信任为目标的增长。”Redistribution based on Cost-Reduction Empowerment; Growth guided by Health and Trust.

Ⅴ. 从 GDP 到 GDE：年轻世代复兴的结构指标

From GDP to GDE: A Structural Indicator for the Revival of the Young Generation

图 4 / Figure 4. 从 GDP 到 GDE 的结构跃迁（The Structural Transition from GDP to GDE）

说明 / Annotation：GDP → GDE 的转型，代表从“数量繁荣”到“生命效率繁荣”的文明跃迁。

在 MAGA 语境下，这一变化意味着：

“从 Make America Great Again 到 Make America Symbiotic Again.”即：让美国从产值驱动，走向以创造、信任与健康为核心的共生增长。

顺便推荐美国社会心理学家乔纳森·海特 (Jonathan Haidt)著作 ：《失控的焦虑世代》 (The Anxious Generation) ，该书核心主题：探讨为什么全球青少年的心理健康状况在近年来急剧恶化，并指出智慧型手机、社交媒体和大型科技公司是导致这一“心理疾病瘟疫”的主要原因。 主要内容和观点包括：1、童年模式的转变： 作者分析了从以玩耍为主导的童年过渡到以手机和虚拟世界为主导的童年所带来的影响。2、大脑的改变： 书中深入探讨了青少年的大脑如何被这些新技术所改变。3、“过度保护与过度放纵”： 海特指出，当前存在一种“对于现实世界过于保护，但在虚拟世界过于放纵”的矛盾现象。4、解决方案： 为了让孩子拥有更健康的成长环境，本书提出了政府、科技公司、学校和父母各自可以采取的具体行动和建议。 

总之，这是一本呼吁大众正视青少年心理健康危机，并主张将手机从童年生活中移除以重建健康成长环境的著作，值得代表“We the People”政治家、经济学家、文化学家和年轻世代自己关注课题。

Ⅵ. 青黄不接的根源：教育、负债与信任赤字

The Root of the Generational Gap: Education, Debt, and the Trust Deficit

“青黄不接”不是偶然，而是结构性断层。

在美国，年轻人面临三重困境：

教育体系的失衡：
      政治正确吞噬了职业精神；大学培养反叛者，却不再培养创造者。

债务体系的陷阱：
高学贷与高房贷压垮了独立意识，使“自由”成为口号而非现实。

信任体系的崩塌：
政府、媒体、学术与资本的权威坍塌，年轻人失去了“信任的坐标”。

GDE 模型给出修复方案：

教育降本（Education Cost Reduction）：恢复学徒制与职业赋能；

创造本土（Localized Empowerment）：以产业回流带动青年就业；

信任共建（Trust Reconstruction）：TPUSA精神进校园普及“Live and let live”。

Ⅶ. 共生经济金桥：重建年轻世代的创造力生态

The Symbionomic Bridge: Rebuilding the Creative Ecology of the Young Generation

要跨越代沟断层，美国必须建立“共生经济金桥”——愛之智慧五律

Figure 5. 践行交互主体共生的金银铜铁通五律（Figure 5. The Five Universal Rules of Amorsophia for Intersubjective Symbiosis)

说明 / Annotation：金、银、铜、铁、通五律，构成人类交互主体共生的行为基石。前四律体现个体与群体之间的伦理层次，第五律为最高通律，是共生文明的价值底线与愛之智慧（Amorsophia）:造物主赋予每个生命的自组织与连接动态平衡力，是律法-福音-共生之约的核心驱动力。因着 Amorsophia 真理，而去偏私，人类才能在金银铜铁通五律中找到各自时空意间的行为指引，经由孞态网（MindsNetworking）实时评估每一念的真伪、善恶、美丑、智慧愚昧、神性堕性、动能激励或抑制人类与AI的互动，而得自由、自省、自治，以共生。

在现实层面，Turning Point USA 已成为这一代际复兴的先锋力量。由查理·柯克（Charlie Kirk）领导的青年运动——包括“教授观察”“校董会观察”“学生行动”“美国节（AmericaFest）”等项目——致力于重建年轻世代的精神体能健康，为 MAHA（Make America Healthy Again） 注入实质内容,也是愛之智慧（Amorsophia）金、银、铜、铁、通五律的体现。

年轻柯克“献宝血”，象征着信仰的勇气，是一种青年自觉与文明续命的牺牲精神。他们唤醒了美国青年对责任、信仰、创造与身体力行的再认同，让“健康生命”成为政治与文明的共生起点。

在结构上、精神上与生态上实现青年再赋能。三大路径：

降本赋能法案（Empowerment through Efficiency Act）：
为青年创业提供税收减免与资本孵化支持。

青年再创造基金（Young Creators Fund）：
由社会资本与州政府共建，以创新项目取代无效补贴。

共生教育网络（Symbiotic Learning Network）：
打通教育—产业—社区之间的再学习循环，让学习、生产、生活、生态重新汇入一体。

这正是GDE黄金律的社会化应用：

C↓ + E↑ → H↑ + T↑ + P↑
让年轻世代重新拥有创造的尊严与生命的孞念。

Ⅷ. 新生活基础设施：三网叠加与愛之智慧孞态网

New Life Infrastructure: The Triple-Network Integration and the Amorsophia MindsField

身处AI大发展的今天，我们既不可以就教育说教育，也不能就AI说AI，而必须同步考虑将“LIFE（生命形态）— AI（智能形态）— TRUST（组织形态）” 的三位一体交互共生格局中。

因此，美国应率先倡导并建设一套融合“技术—伦理—组织新生活方式的基础设施。这一基础设施，正是三网叠加（NET × IoT × MN） 的文明升级：

互联网（NET）：连接信息对称，解决“信息不对称”的社会割裂；

物联网（IoT）：连接感应互联，实现能量与物质的自组织循环；

孞联网（MN, MindsNetworking）：连接心智共振，使生命、智能与组织进入愛的智慧秩序。

三网叠加的结构，使人类社会的创造力、伦理约束与信任体系得以重新平衡，
并以 Amorsophia（愛之智慧） 为中枢驱动力，让科技与人心在“时空意间共生场”中形成新的动态秩序。

因此，我们呼吁美国政府牵头发起 “Amorsophia MindsField Initiative”，以三网叠加的技术—伦理支撑体系为文明转型的基石，引导全球迈向 责任政府（Responsible Government）、健康社会（Healthy Society） 与 共生未来（Symbiotic Future） 的新生活方式。

Ⅸ. 结语：从“Make America Great Again”到“Make America Symbiotic Again”

Conclusion: From MAGA to MASA — A Civilization of Symbiotic Renewal

MAGA 是责任，MAHA 是生命。
当前美国的复兴，必须同时恢复责任政府的结构平衡与全民健康的生命能量。

川普经济哲学的终极意义，不在资本，而在人心。
“再伟大”不是重复建设，而是复原社会经济健康。

当国家财政以降本赋能为前提，
当社会信任以健康与公正为基石，
当年轻世代重拾创造与责任的荣耀——“Make America Great Again”将自然升华为：

“Make America Symbiotic Again.”
Peace. Trust. Empowerment. Health. Symbiosis.

这不仅是美国的复兴之路，也是人类文明从角逐走向共生的金桥。

WHITE PAPER

The Achilles’ Heel of MAGA: The Symbionomic Bridge to America’s Young Generation Revival

Ⅰ. Midnight Reflection

Machines have returned, but people have not; factories are rebuilt, but craftsmen are gone.
America’s manufacturing revival has created over one million new jobs—yet between 450,000 and 500,000 positions remain unfilled.
This is the structural fault line of a generation—the Achilles’ heel of American greatness.

The Trump administration has rebuilt global supply chains and driven industrial reshoring,
only to discover that the younger generation lacks the strength and skill to take the helm.

Thirty years of politically correct education, twenty years of industrial hollowing-out, and fifteen years of welfare dependency
have produced a generation that:

• lives off government (living off taxpayers is worse than living off parents),

• consumes society while losing self-respect,

• seeks reward without work,

• is physically weakened, mentally anxious, and spiritually detached.

The result is the breeding ground of “Electoral Rhetorical Communism”—
an American version of democratic socialism that thrives on emotional politics and redistributive illusion.
It is the Achilles’ heel of MAGA.

The recent New York mayoral election serves as a mirror:
the Democratic Party won the election but lost its soul;
the Republican Party kept its faith but lost its grassroots reach.
Both MAGA (Make America Great Again) and MAHA (Make America Healthy Again)
have yet to reach the living nerves of states, cities, and communities.

A parallel lesson can be drawn from China’s institutional evolution, which reveals the cost of civilizational fracture:

• The first thirty years relied on “non-agricultural households” consuming “commodity grain” while “agricultural households” were forced to surrender “public grain”—a quasi-war model of extraction.

• The following forty years leaned on “Most-Favored-Nation” status, “GSP” benefits, “low-human-rights labor,” and “high-energy exploitation,” exchanging environmental and human costs for distorted growth.

The three chronic diseases are identical across both systems:

1. Upward mobility blocked—resources monopolized by insiders;

2. Overgrown bureaucracy and debt traps—states and corporations becoming insolvent;

3. Suppression of private innovators (“the 56789 contributors”)—those providing 5.3% GDP growth, 6.4% GDP contribution, 7.4% job creation, 8.4% tax revenue, and 9.6% of R&D investment.

Both the U.S. and China share a common root cause: educational dislocation under political correctness.

• China’s reform: success in universal access, failure in cultivating free rationality—creativity deficit.

• America’s change: success in liberal education, failure in maintaining vocational competence—redistribution replacing creation.

Trump’s vision of MAGA was never a slogan—it was a moral reminder that every government must first be accountable to its own people.
This embodies the spirit of MAGA–MAHA:

Responsible government and healthy citizens—economic revival hand in hand with the revival of life.

Figure 1. MAGA–MAHA–GDE: The Symbiotic Path from Responsible Government to National Health

Annotation:
From Trump’s MAGA to MAHA to the GDE (Gross Domestic Efficiency) model in Symbionomics, this pathway reveals a structural leap:
political responsibility → holistic health → symbiotic civilization.
The government’s duty is not merely to grow the economy, but to sustain the people’s physical, mental, and spiritual dignity.

Ⅱ. Dismantling the “Electoral Rhetorical Communism” — The Soft Totalitarian Cycle of Welfare Politics

The United States is drifting into a subtle new form of soft totalitarianism—
a system where “free, subsidized, and guaranteed” rhetoric becomes the currency of elections.

This phenomenon—called Electoral Rhetorical Communism—
refers to a welfare-for-votes cycle that disguises emotional promises as moral salvation
while leaving behind fiscal chaos and dependency once votes are secured.
It is “charity politics” in the clothing of democracy.

The cycle runs as follows:

Welfare → Votes → Deficits → Anxiety,
replacing creators with claimants, and re-creation with redistribution.

In essence, “Electoral Rhetorical Communism,” the American version of democratic socialism,
is a systemic loop of welfare, anxiety, dependency, and ballots—
transforming benevolence into fiscal coercion and moral dependence.

Ⅱ-1. How the Soft Totalitarian Cycle Forms

When a society remains trapped in high cost, low opportunity, and low trust,
its citizens—especially the young—naturally shift their political psychology
from creators to claimants.

In this structure, any slogan that promises “relief, subsidy, or free provision”
is perceived as redemptive language, regardless of fiscal consequences.
Thus emerges a political feedback loop:

Pain creation → Welfare promise → Vote return → Fiscal deficit → Renewed pain

This is not an ideological import—it is the structural reflection of collective anxiety.
When anxiety becomes the main fuel of politics,
redistribution replaces creation,
and political discourse degenerates from how to produce to how to divide(See also Archer Hong Qian, The Age of Reconciliation: From Communism to Symbiosism, Hong Kong New Culture Publishing Co., 2007.).

Ⅱ-2. From Welfare to Votes: The Political Feedback Mechanism

High Cost × Low Opportunity × Low Trust
           ↓
Creators → Claimants
           ↓
Redemptive Rhetoric: Relief, Subsidy, Guarantee
           ↓
Vote Reward
           ↓
Fiscal Deficit ↑
           ↓New Pain → New Promise

Data alarms:

• In 2024, one-third of U.S. households relied on at least one federal welfare program (U.S. Census Bureau).

• Youth labor participation (ages 16–24) fell to 56.2%, a 50-year low (BLS).

• Identity politics accounted for 42% of midterm election advertising (Wesleyan Media Project).

This is soft totalitarianism in moral disguise—
an equation of Good Intention × Anxiety × Dependency = Legitimate Entitlement.

Ⅱ-3. Three Intersecting Fault Lines

These layers overlap to form a systemic soft-tyranny ecology—
a structure driven by benevolence, sustained by anxiety, and perpetuated by dependency.
Its danger lies in erasing the will to create while legitimizing the right to demand.

Ⅱ-4. From the Politics of Benevolence to the Civilization of Empowerment

To dismantle the foundations of Electoral Rhetorical Communism,
America must shift from a Politics of Benevolence to a Civilization of Empowerment.

Three structural transformations are essential:

1. From Redistribution to Re-Creation:
   Replace “subsidy, free, guarantee” with “skill, innovation, self-reliance.”
   The government must transform from provider to enabler.

2. From Identity Mobilization to Responsibility Mobilization:
   The political focus must move from “who is hurt” to “who contributes.”
   Equality of opportunity does not mean exemption from effort.

3. From Emotional Elections to Structural Repair:
   Prevent short-term populist mobilization through intergenerational consensus mechanisms.
   Integrate education, industry, family, community, and physical vitality
   into a coherent national ecosystem rather than fragmented welfare programs.

Ultimately, the American people—We the People—must rebuild democracy on creation, not anxiety;
on empowerment, not dependency.
To cure this soft totalitarianism, we must return to Adam Smith’s triad—Peace, Easy Taxes, and Justice—
replacing demand with creation, and confrontation with symbiosis.

Ⅲ. Adam Smith’s Point of Origin and Trump’s Return to the Natural Law of Prosperity

As early as 1755, Adam Smith wrote:

“Little else is required to carry a state to the highest degree of opulence from the lowest barbarism
but peace, easy taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice.”

In other words, “Apart from peace, low taxes, and a tolerable administration of justice,
nothing else is needed to turn a backward nation into a prosperous one.”

These three elements—Peace, Easy Taxes, and Justice—form the moral foundation of modern economics.
Prosperity does not arise from expansion or coercion,
but from structural balance, institutional lightness, and just order（参考《共生经济学的发生学原理——回到亚当斯密“和平经济学”原点再出发（The Embryological Principles of Symbionomics——Revisiting Adam Smith's Vision of "Peaceconomics" and Starting Again）》http://symbiosism.com.cn/11085.html）.

Trump’s economic philosophy represents a modern return to Smith’s triad.
Amid global institutional distortions and generational decline,
he sought to revive the natural order of prosperity through cost reduction and empowerment.

Figure 1. MAGA–MAHA–GDE: The Symbiotic Path from Responsible Government to National Health

Annotation:
From Trump’s MAGA to MAHA to the Symbionomic model GDE (Gross Domestic Efficiency),
this pathway represents the structural evolution of prosperity—from political responsibility to ethical health to symbiotic civilization.

Figure 2. From Adam Smith’s “Three Elements of Prosperity” to Trump’s GDE Symbiotic Model

Ⅳ. Redistribution Based on Cost-Reduction Empowerment: Trump’s Symbionomic Logic

Ⅳ-1. Creation First: The Living Source of Redistribution

Redistribution must be founded on creation.
Only when a society continually generates genuine creative energy—labor, technology, innovation, and moral dedication—does redistribution gain vitality.
Otherwise, redistribution becomes the plunder of existing wealth, not the return of created value.

Redistribution is not charity; it is respect for creation.

Hence, Symbionomics emphasizes:

Redistribution based on Cost Reduction and Empowerment is redistribution based on Creation.

The healthy social cycle should be:

Creation → Cost Reduction → Empowerment → Redistribution → Re-Creation.

Creation precedes distribution; dignity precedes welfare.

Ⅳ-2. The Role of Government: From Redistributor to Midwife of Co-Growth

In traditional systems, governments see themselves as distributors of resources.
But in Symbionomics, government should act as the midwife of co-growth—
a catalyst of creation and a coordinator of structural balance.

In the GDE model:

C × E → H × T → P

Governments promote Cost Reduction and Empowerment,
which generate Health and Trust,
and ultimately lead to Peaceful Coexistence.

The government is not the owner of wealth but the catalyst of creation;
redistribution is not reward or punishment, but the echo of life.

Ⅳ-3. The Big and Beautiful Act: A Paradigm of Symbiotic Creation

Trump’s Big and Beautiful Act symbolizes this structural transformation—
not “big government,” but efficient empowerment through creative cost reduction.

“We will rebuild America beautifully, not bureaucratically.” —Donald J. Trump

It aimed to ignite greater creative capacity with lower systemic costs:

• Cost Reduction: cutting bureaucracy and waste

• Empowerment: revitalizing manufacturing and innovation

• Redistribution: creation-based, non-inflationary growth

The GDE formula expresses this equilibrium:

$$GDE=f(C,E,H,T,P)$$

Figure 3. The Golden Rule of Health: GDE Value Parameters within the MAGA Framework

Cost Reduction → Empowerment → Health → Trust → Peace

Core Statement:
Redistribution based on cost-reduction empowerment; growth guided by health and trust.

Ⅴ. From GDP to GDE: The Structural Indicator for the Young Generation’s Revival

Young Americans no longer believe GDP growth guarantees well-being.
They need an indicator of life efficiency and trust health—GDE (Gross Domestic Efficiency).

I would also recommend The Anxious Generation by American social psychologist Jonathan Haidt. The book’s core theme is an exploration of why the mental health of teenagers around the world has deteriorated sharply in recent years, identifying smartphones, social media, and Big Tech companies as the main causes of this “epidemic of psychological illness.”

Its main ideas include:

1. The Transformation of Childhood — Haidt analyzes the shift from a play-based childhood to one dominated by smartphones and virtual worlds, and the profound consequences this has brought.

2. Changes in the Brain — The book delves into how adolescents’ brains are being reshaped by these new technologies.

3. “Overprotection and Overindulgence” — Haidt points out a striking contradiction in modern parenting: overprotecting children in the real world while overindulging them in the virtual one.

4. Solutions — To foster a healthier environment for children’s growth, the book proposes specific actions and recommendations for governments, tech companies, schools, and parents.

In short, this is a powerful call for society to confront the mental health crisis among youth and to remove smartphones from childhood life as a means to rebuild a healthy environment for growth. It is a book that deserves the attention of politicians, economists, cultural scholars, and the younger generation who represent the spirit of “We the People.”

Ⅵ. The Root of the Generational Gap: Education, Debt, and the Trust Deficit

“Disconnection between the green and the ripe” is structural, not incidental.
American youth face a triple crisis:

1. Educational imbalance: universities train critics, not creators.

2. Debt traps: student and housing loans crush independence.

3. Collapse of trust: governments, media, and academia have lost credibility.

The GDE model offers remedies:

• Education cost reduction: reintroduce apprenticeships and skill empowerment;

• Localized empowerment: manufacturing return → youth employment;

• Trust reconstruction: governments as catalysts, not distributors.

Ⅶ. The Symbionomic Bridge: Rebuilding the Creative Ecology of the Young Generation

To bridge the generational gap, the U.S. must establish a Symbionomic Bridge—a living ecosystem of youth empowerment.

Three key pathways:

1. Empowerment through Efficiency Act – tax incentives for youth entrepreneurship;

2. Young Creators Fund – social capital co-invested with state governments;

3. Symbiotic Learning Network – linking education, industry, and community for lifelong creative flow.

Figure 5. The Five Universal Rules of Amorsophia for Intersubjective Symbiosis

These five rules—gold, silver, bronze, iron, and general—form the moral bedrock of intersubjective symbiosis.

Ⅷ. New Life Infrastructure: The Triple-Network Integration and the Amorsophia MindsField

Within the trinity of LIFE (Biological Form), AI (Intelligent Form), and TRUST (Organizational Form),
America should lead the creation of a new life infrastructure—
a system integrating technology, ethics, and organization.

This represents the triple-network upgrade (NET × IoT × MN):

• Internet (NET): solves informational asymmetry;

• Internet of Things (IoT): connects sensory and energy cycles;

• MindsNetwork (MN): connects the resonance of consciousness, aligning life, intelligence, and trust under Amorsophia.

Through this integration, creativity, morality, and credibility are rebalanced.
Amorsophia (Wisdom of Love) becomes the moral–technological nucleus,
enabling a dynamic harmony within the “Spatio-Temporal Interminds Field.”

Thus, the U.S. should initiate an Amorsophia MindsField Initiative—
establishing this triple-network framework as the foundation for global transformation toward
Responsible Government, Healthy Society, and a Symbiotic Future.

Figure 6. Human–AI Symbiotic Effect Across the Spatio-Temporal Interminds through the AM–AI Mechanism

From Internet → IoT → MindsNetwork, humanity evolves
from information exchange → sensory interconnection → mind resonance.
Through the AM–AI mechanism (Amorsophia–Artificial Intelligence),
human creativity, ethics, and trust unify into a living order of Freedom–Justice–Symbiosis.

Figure 7. From Anthropocene to Earthropocene: Toward the Era of the Amorsophia MindsNetwork

This figure illustrates humanity’s evolutionary leap
from the Natural Age → Anthropocene → Earthropocene.
As AI and AM converge, humankind enters an era of conscious intersubjective symbiosis—
where Intersubjective Symbiosism bridges ego and object,
and the Amorsophia MindsNetwork becomes the ethical–technological axis of a new civilization.

Ⅸ. Conclusion: From “Make America Great Again” to “Make America Symbiotic Again”

The ultimate meaning of Trump’s economic philosophy lies not in capital, but in conscience.
“To be great again” is not to repeat glory,
but to reconstruct structural balance between production, life, and ecology.

When fiscal policy is guided by cost reduction and empowerment,
when social trust rests on health and justice,
and when the young generation regains creative dignity and responsibility,
MAGA will naturally evolve into:

MASA — Make America Symbiotic Again.

Peace. Trust. Empowerment. Health. Symbiosis.
These are the five pillars of America’s living renaissance—
a bridge from national revival to the Symbiotic Civilization of the Earthropocene.