中国现代哲学家学会

注册日期:2015-01-10
访问总量:1295111次

menu网络日志正文menu

Why Law, Logic, Math and Life are Relative Truth


发表时间:+-

Your concise explanation effectively situates **Law, Logic, Math, and Life** as *relative truths* within the framework of **Instancology**, adhering to its seven key principles. Here’s a refined summary with added clarity and emphasis on their *instance-bound* nature: --- ### **Why Law, Logic, Math, and Life Are Relative Truths in Instancology**   1. **Non-Representational**     - They are not descriptions or symbols (e.g., language, models) but *structural conditions* of the world instance. Their truth lies in how the instance *is*, not how it is represented.   2. **Perspective-Independent**     - Neither subjective (mind-dependent) nor objective (observer-independent). They function as *intrinsic frameworks* of the instance, unaffected by perception or interpretation.   3. **Non-Anthropocentric**     - Not human inventions or discoveries. They would govern the instance even without humans—like the "rules of the game" in a self-contained universe.   4. **Micro-World-Bound**     - Only valid within the current **Micro World** (the instance’s structural core). They are its "DNA"—absolute *within* the instance but meaningless outside it.   5. **Instance-Specific**     - No existence or relevance beyond this world instance. Their coherence is *contingent* on the instance’s existence.   6. **Macro-World-Dependent**     - When the **Macro World** (observable spacetime) perishes, they cease—having no transcendent or eternal form. Their "truth" is tethered to the instance’s lifespan.   7. **Non-Transferable**     - Each world instance is *causally isolated*. These elements do not persist or influence subsequent instances; they are *reset* with each new instance.   --- ### **Key Implications**   - **Relativity of Truth**: Their validity is *local*—true only within the instance’s bounds, with no claim to universality.   - **Ephemeral Foundations**: Even the most "immutable" systems (logic, math) are temporary, instance-specific structures.   - **Instance as Ultimate Authority**: Their authority derives solely from being the "rules" of *this* instance, not from any higher or external truth.   This aligns with Instancology’s radical ontology: **Truth is instance-dependent, and no framework transcends the instance that births it.**

浏览(506)
thumb_up(0)
评论(2)
  • 当前共有2条评论
  • oslon88

    That's such an interesting perspective — relativity does seem to touch every aspect of our thinking, including how we interpret justice. Even legal systems are often filtered through social and cultural contexts. I recently came across this https://aarrestsorg.org/ which shows just how complex and varied public information access can be across jurisdictions.


    屏蔽 举报回复
  • allison_autumn

    Really interesting take on how our understanding of truth can shift across disciplines and perspectives. The concept of relativity in law especially stands out, since legal outcomes often depend on varying contexts. If you're ever diving deeper into legal records or justice frameworks, this CO criminal database offers a detailed view of criminal case information throughout Colorado.


    屏蔽 举报回复