论富豪治国——评川普新政的共生经济范式创新
Governance by the Wealthy
论富豪治国
— A Symbionomic Paradigm Innovation in Trump’s New Governance
——评川普新政的共生经济范式创新
钱 宏（Archer Hong Qian）
亲爱的读者朋友：
川普是个大事件（米莱也是），高高在上地自以为是，或以非为是地骂倒或捧倒，皆源自不适应（间接立场性观念）或适应（直接利益性常识），皆不足取，更不足为训。
对这个翻动世界的大事件，一定得有合历史又合逻辑的解释，“论富豪治国”只是一种我所谓共生经济学Symbionomics的尝试，真心請你指教，听你高见！
Dear readers and friends,
Trump is a major global phenomenon (as is Milei). Whether we criticize him harshly from a moral high ground or praise him blindly, such reactions often stem from either a failure to adapt (indirectly shaped by ideological beliefs) or a form of adaptation (driven by direct, interested reasoning). Neither is commendable, nor should they be taken as a model.
In facing such world-shaking events, we need explanations that are both historically grounded and logically sound. My essay on "On Billionaires Governing Nations" is merely an attempt—within the framework of what I call Symbionomics, or symbiotic economics.I sincerely welcome your thoughts and critiques. I’d love to hear your insights!
“富豪治国”，并非资本掌权的全球化2.0的旧叙事，而是回应21世纪治理范式转变的一种实验性路径：它以全球化3.0的交互主体共生的市场效率和组织责任为基础，导入共生经济学（Symbionomics）的健康黄金率GDE价值标准，构建面向未来的政策评估体系，即可初见端倪。
“Governance by the wealthy” is not a continuation of the old Globalization 2.0 narrative of capital domination, but rather an experimental pathway responding to the paradigm shift in 21st-century governance. It is grounded in the market efficiency and organizational responsibility inherent in Globalization 3.0’s intersubjective symbiosis, and incorporates the GDE-based Golden Ratio of Economic Health from Symbionomics（共生经济学） as a normative standard for evaluating policies oriented toward the future—whose initial outlines are now beginning to surface and will be gradually revealed in the following analysis.
引言：从现象到范式的转捩点
“富豪治国”并非资本掌权的旧叙事，而是回应21世纪治理范式转变的一种实验性路径：它以市场效率和组织责任为基础，导入共生经济学（Symbionomics）的健康黄金率GDE价值标准，构建面向未来的政策评估体系。
基于生命自组织连接动态平衡的交互主体共生哲学的认知，我们提出“共生权范式”转移条件下，以“仨自组织人”降本/赋能健康黄金律为研究对象和理论架构的共生经济学。该范式超越了以“理性经济人”效率/公平增长黄金律为研究对象的国富论经济学，也超越了以“行动人”自由/自律黄金律为研究对象的奥派经济学，直指人的身心灵健康与生活方式创新再选择，让生产回归生活、生活呈现生态，生态绽放生命。
共生经济学认为，我们可以用“降本/赋能/孞托/健康/和平”五因交互评价标准，衡量川普MAGA运动提出的“20个对美国的核心承诺”，及其已然实施的平衡财政的六大政策举措，也是衡量米莱总统在阿根廷推行的反特权平衡财政调整经济结构的“五月公约”历史性影响的圭臬。
2025年，第47任美国总统唐纳德·川普开启第二任期，其组建的行政团队堪称现代历史上最富有的政府班底。13位亿万富豪走入白宫，不仅是一种人事安排，更是一次制度实验和治理范式的创新，很有可能成为人类Transform of Trust组织平台建构的历史转捩点。
笔者通过系统梳理发现，川普团队的多项政策安排，如富豪内阁、税收激励、主权基金、审批权资本化、“社交媒体治国”等，远远越出了现行政治经济学陷入效率或公平二元对立的尴尬，又恰好可以用共生经济学（Symbionomics）的健康黄金率函数（Golden Ratio of Economic Health）乘法+复利思维加以表达。
一、共生经济学健康黄金率五因交互模型
共生经济学认为，经济行为的终极目标，不能偏离“人的身心灵健康”。在成本与收益的消长关系中，必须引入“健康”这一高阶变量，形成“成本/收益/健康”的黄金率模型。这一理论基础依托于三大生命自组织力（生理、心理、社会）与外连接自平衡力（结构、制度、文化）的交互机制。所以，任何政策组合的最终目的，在于促进“个体与社会身心灵健康”和生活方式的创新与系统性优化再选择，其评估均可由以下“五因交互标准健康值公式”体现。
这是一个以“复利逻辑”驱动的五因交互评价模型，其核心思想是将政策行为的效果放在一个多维、能量动态的系统中衡量。每个变量代表的含义如下：
根据共生经济学（Symbionomics）降本赋能健康黄金律，得出政治经济政策标准，五因交互评分和健康值计算：健康值 = 降本÷赋能×健康因子×孞托结构×和平（Health Value= (C÷E)×H×T×P），五因指标均可标准化为结构均衡的1.0中值，高于1表示贡献度高，低于 1 则表示存在结构性张力。
值得注意的是，五因交互结构健康指数（Health Index %），是评估系统可持续性的综合表达，可用于国家政策、城市治理、企业战略、国际关系、民间调查与普及新认知等各类治理体系的结构性分析和战略组合优化。
GDE（Gross Domestic Efficacy），以资源健康值（Health Value）为核心评价单位，是共生经济学提出的结构价值参量。GDE通过“降本 / 赋能 × 健康 × 信托 × 和平”五因交互模型，运用乘法复利逻辑，系统衡量政策、经济活动对社会结构与生态系统的综合健康贡献。它代表的是一种从量的堆积到质的优化的范式跃迁，是对传统GDP逻辑的系统性升级与替代。
GDP（Gross Domestic Product），以资本周转总量为核心统计目标，采用加法合计逻辑（如收入、支出、投资总额），侧重于经济增长速度与规模，但忽略了资源效率、环境承载、身心健康、社会信任等结构性变量。在面对复杂、互联、生态化的全球治理新格局时，GDP模型呈现出结构单一、方向偏失的局限性。
二、六项核心政策结构评分与健康指数
在共生经济学的框架下，我们可以用“降本/赋能/孞托/健康/和平”五大评价标准，衡量川普MAGA运动提出的“20个对美国的核心承诺”及其已然实施的平衡财政六大政策举措。
1.DOGE政府效率部：通过技术手段优化行政管理，提高政府运作效率，减少不必要的官僚成本。
2.加关税促谈判（短期增收）：通过贸易政策调整，实现短期财政增收，并作为谈判筹码促进公平贸易，其收入用于基建和社会保障，增强国家经济稳定性。
3.减免所得税与消费税：降低税收负担，刺激企业发展和居民消费，提高整体经济活力。
4.川普金卡（美国绿卡）：预计全球发行700万张，每张售价500万美元，总额35万亿美元，相当于美国全部国债的总额。通过此方式吸引高净值人群，为美国财政带来直接收入，同时促进经济增长。
5.主权基金：利用加关税收入设立，同时对美国政府的招标合同收取一定比例的信誉费，形成长期稳定的财政支持，主要用于基础设施建设和社会保障，以长期改善民生和社区竞争力。
6.遣返非法移民：减少社会福利负担，缓解住房压力，提升社区安全，增强社会信任。
根据加权结构健康指数模型和共生治理策略的结构协同，六项政策影响力设定如下权重：DOGE（25%），加关税（15%），减税（20%），金卡（20%），主权基金（10%），遣返非法移民（10%）。根据加权模型，六项政策的综合健康指数为：85.1%。
Health Value = (C ÷ E) × H × T × P
六项政策的组合不是单一的激励工具，而是一个“攻守配位型共生治理体系”：DOGE效率部改革与主权基金机制构成治理骨架，金卡与减税形成基层活力注入机制，加关税则为战略谈判工具，遣返非法移民净化社区有利生活安宁。以上举措一环扣一环，健康指数总评得分为：85.1％，具有高度制度可持续性。“20个对美国的核心承诺”都可望一一兑现！
三、川普新政的结构效能表现 —— 健康黄金率视角
为更直观地理解川普新政六项核心政策在共生经济学“健康黄金率模型”中的表现，本文以柱状图与雷达图呈现其结构得分与健康指数分布。
🔵 左图：政策健康值柱状图（Policy Health Value Comparison），展示六大政策的五因交互上的分值：横轴为六项政策名称，纵轴为根据健康值公式Health Value = (C ÷ E) × H × T × P，所计算出的复合型“结构健康指数”；红色虚线为系统基准线（值为 1.0），代表五因交互模型下的“结构均衡值”；柱体高于 1.0 表示该政策对结构优化、系统活力与制度健康具有正向促进作用。例如：DOGE效率部（1.43） 与 主权基金（1.32） 显著高于均衡线，展现政策整合力与制度效能优势；相对而言，加关税（0.64）与基层减税（0.54）处于1.0以下，提示需配套补偿机制或缓冲机制和结构优化。
🔵 右图：政策结构雷达图（Policy Structure Radar Chart），展示各政策在五因交互上的表现：Cost 降本 (C)、Empowerment 赋能 (E)、Health 健康 (H)、Trust 信托 (T)、Peace 和平 (P)，越接近外圈表示该因子贡献越高；越接近中心表示该维度较弱；各政策形成了不同的“结构轮廓”，揭示其在治理系统中的定位、强项与互补空间。例如：Trump Green Card（川普金卡） 在 赋能（E） 与 和平（P） 两维度表现最强，强调通过移民资源交易推动全球合作；DOGE效率部 则侧重于 降本（C） 与 制度信任（T），体现结构压缩与治理透明度优化。
四、美国的全球信誉与全球化3.0
这里要特别强调的是，川普政府的移民政策不仅是国内事务，更涉及全球共生经济的稳定与发展。从源头上消除非法移民问题，是以政治、经济、军事实力帮助那些受斗争冲突攫取型国家摆脱困境，实现和解、守约与和平经济建设。这也构成了美国在全球经济体系中的最大国际义务，同时是维护美元全球储备货币孞誉（20个核心承诺之一）的战略举措。
在第73届联合国大会上，美国总统唐纳德·川普2018年9月25日发表讲话，强调各国领导人应对本国人民负责的立场。他表示：“我们为美国，为美国人民全力以赴，同时我们也全力维护整个世界。”我相信这也是川普接过里根总统的MAGA口号注入的新意，每个国家、区域或社区历史上都有过辉煌时刻，所以，每个领导人都要对自己的人民负责，让他们自组织连接平衡再次伟大！
基于此，我对巩固美国国际孞誉与全球化3.0经济布局，提出一些预测性评估，美国在全球经济体系中的共生布局包括：
1、《乌美矿产基建协议》：确保稀缺资源的稳定供应，也是对乌克兰最扎实的安全保障；2、《美欧石化协议》：通过互惠贸易协定，优化石化产业供应链，降低欧洲能源依赖风险，解决不再一边支持乌克兰抗俄入侵一边给俄罗斯输血的矛盾；3、《美俄资源协议》：通过合作而非对抗，稳定全球资源市场，引导俄罗斯走上和平建设之路，减少地缘政治冲突；4、《美中惠民贸易协议》：通过调整贸易结构，解决中美之间的结构性失衡问题，缓解由此带来的官民矛盾冲突，帮助中国走出“转型中期陷阱”；5、《印太和平战略规划》：推动印太地区的经济合作与安全稳定，促进区域发展平衡；6、《北美三零规则》：推动区域经济一体化，实现零关税、零补贴、零壁垒的共生经济格局；7、《全球共生公约》：以交互主体共生哲学为基础，推动国际社会建立新型合作框架，实现真正的可持续发展；8、“孞態网计划”（MindsNetworking）:如果继互联网（Internet）解决信息对称问题、物联网（Internet of Things）解决万物感应互联之后，美国率先建构解决孞念交互动態平衡的MindsNetworking，作为透明政治的基础设施，将普惠全球，功德无量！
五、善政良治的信托机制：多做少说与既做也说
在共生经济学的健康黄金律模型中，“信托结构（T）”不仅是制度本身的公信力，还包括政策出台和执行过程中是否具有公开性、解释力与可参与度，有助于减少社会交易成本和边际效益成本，提高人民的健康值、幸福感和尊严感，净化政坛，走向善政良治之路。
在全球格局动荡不安、信息战与认知战日益加剧的时代，川普团队在国际事务上的策略，应当避免喧哗取宠，而更多采取“行动大于宣言、沉默胜于张扬”的姿态。国际政策不妨“以战术模糊掩护战略清晰”，哪怕略显神秘，也胜于被过度解读。
但在国内事务上，情况恰恰相反：民众对政策的参与度、可理解度、信任度，将直接影响政策的执行效率与社会反馈系统。因此，“治理透明度与公众讲述能力”就成了政务系统不可或缺的一环。象最近商务部长Lutnick、财政部长Bessent，特别是Musk，还有把一段时间对自己负责的部门政策如何出台、定期公开用好朋友聊天的方式，把政策原理、执行机制、财政路径与可预期效果（比如国库/国民同时增收/节约各15%，平衡财政/通货/、平衡居民就业/消费）说出来，正体现了信托结构的“讲述力变量”——不是只靠制度和数据赢得信托，而是通过面对面的解释、持续的反馈、真实的倾听，构建起公众参与的认知共生体。
国家、企业、政府和非政府的受孞托组织的治理，既要多做少讲，又要既做也讲，包括讲大道理——治理即盐更是光。治理既需照亮现实，也需照见逻辑；它不是藏起的工程，而是交互主体共生系统。
“富豪治国”是将治理的理性、实践与讲述力结合起来，将“灯”点亮、架高、照人，让整个国家在“千灯互照，光光交澈”中看清方向。这也合了美国“山巅之城”的立国精神（温思罗普）。
六、川普：从直觉治理，到范式创新
川普的“富豪治国”新政模式，虽常遭舆论质疑为任性的直觉式治理，但他的“直觉治理”（intuitive governance）背后隐藏着“系统需求”（systemic necessity）与“范式转换”（paradigm shift）的双重力量。
川普团队的工作，还将证明“资本家”作为19世纪以来社会主义运动的政治标签，该扔到历史的垃圾堆了！有人说“剥削来自于权力，而不是资本”。如果资本与权力结合，作为资本主体的资本家，既不需要与权力沆瀣一气为自己谋利，又能把自己卓越的成事智慧用在国家治理上，那么，只要有机会，无论如何都是值得大胆偿试的好事！
幸运的是，Trump交了三个思行事成的好朋友：Lutnick、Musk和Bessent（各自在金融、科技、投资领域代表了新时代的“能动者”），他们与Trump的联结，可以视作一种“资本-权力-愿景”三位一体的治理模型，其内核或许远不只是传统意义上的公共利益驱动，而是“高效、自组织、使命驱动”的孞態网式的勰和共生体，也是全球化3.0时代，具有趋势性的“自组织精英治国”政体，亦或是数字时代“后国家治理”的雏形？所以，“富豪治国”并非简单的“资本家掌权”，更不是以金钱凌驾制度的特权治理。它的本质，是将市场逻辑与企业管理理念引入国家治理系统，以提升政策执行的效率与制度运行的透明度。这种治理模式，不是为资本服务，而是通过制定更高标准的治理要求，推动公共政策的结构优化与普惠价值的兑现。
其根本前提，是以公平为导向的系统责任结构：任何施政者、任何政策举措，都必须接受“降本赋能健康黄金率”的量化审查与系统性评价，确保其所设计与推行的政策方案，能够激发社会每一个人、每一个群体的生命自组织连接平衡活力（Symbiotic Activation of Self and Society）。
因此，“富豪治国”不意味着“强者支配和操纵弱者”，而是更少以权谋私，推动构建一个以责任换权能、以活力替操纵的交互主体共生体制（Intersubjective Symbiotic Governance）。
结语
建康黄金律五因交互评价川普新政六项核心政策总评得分85.1%，说明川普团队不会陷入David Halberstam在《出类拔萃之辈》中所警示的一批超级精英如何让国家陷入自己编织的“战术勤奋掩盖战略短视”的巨网之中，更不会如《纽时》写手Thomas Loren Friedman及几位诺奖得主以守残抱缺的全球化2.0价值标准，轻率得出的所谓《一场大解体，正在上演》。相反，这是一场基于共生经济学逻辑的全球化3.0的升级重塑。
未来，随着美国“富豪治国”实验的深入，以及《全球共生公约》和孞態网（MindsNetworking）的推进，共生经济学将成为人们理解国际关系与一国政策制定的新范式。
2025年3月23-27日于Vancouver
Email：hongguanworld@gmail.com
+1 604 690 6088
https://blog.creaders.net/u/34216/202503/511881.html
参考文献 References
1.Wittgenstein:《逻辑哲学论》（Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus）
2.Peter Thiel：ZERO TO ONE-Notes On Startups，Or How To Build The Future
3.Michael Polanyt: Personal Knowledge—Towards Post-Critical Philosophy
4.George Soros: Open Society：Reforming Global Capitalism
5.Archer Hong Qian:《SYMBIOSISM·共生——The Mind Power to Agree on An Innovative Lifestyle·一种约定创新生活方式的精神力量》，Onebook Press，CANADA，2021
钱 宏主编：《全球共生：化解冲突重建世界秩序的中国学派》Global Symbiosism：Chinese School of Defusing Clashes and Rebuilding the World Order，晨星出版社，2018
7.Archer：《全球化3.0价值观：从重集体理念，到重个体生命——Transform of Trust组织平台，从降本赋能开始》，http://symbiosism.com.cn/9768.html
钱 宏：《GDE生態价值参量的理论框架——再论新国民“生产-交换-生活”账户核算体系》（Theoretical Framework of GDE Ecological Value Parameters — Revisiting the Accounting System for the New National Accounts of Production, Exchange, and Living），《经济要参》2017，http://symbiosism.com.cn/3018.html
9.钱 宏：《和解的年代：从共产主义到共生主义》（The Reconciliation Time：From Communism to Symbiosism）,Published & Printed in Hong Kong,2007
Archer Hong Qian：《地球世：愛之智慧孞態网（Earthropocene: Amorsophia MindsNetworking）》，http://symbiosism.com.cn/9348.html
《共生经济学（Symbionomics）21世纪人类政治经济组织行为的经济学因应之道》，Onebook Press，CANADA，2023，http://symbiosism.com.cn/7695.html共生经济学原创稿件（2008-2025）
共生权：经济学叙事的范式转移（The Symbiorights：a Paradigm shift in Economic narrative），http://symbiosism.com.cn/5861.html
From the U.S.-Ukraine Mineral Agreement to the U.S.-Europe Petrochemical Agreement: A Strategic Transition，http://symbiosism.com.cn/9644.html
Archer Hong Qian:《共生：联合国叙事的典范转移》The Symbiosism: a Paradigm shift in UN narrative，http://symbiosism.com.cn/5898.html
15.《重申“终结乌克兰战争的第三条道路”（Reaffirming "The Third Path to Ending the War in Ukraine"）》， http://symbiosism.com.cn/9487.html
16.《川普新政Trump's New Deal——共生经济学：成本效率、游戏规则、资孞创价，及其时空意间》， http://symbiosism.com.cn/8977.html
Archer Hong Qian：《大格局、大使命、大智慧——写于Trump当选第47任美国总统当日》，http://symbiosism.com.cn/8893.html
祝福川普总统（Blessings for President Trump），http://symbiosism.com.cn/9375.html
On Governance by the Wealthy:
A Symbionomic Paradigm Innovation in Trump’s New Deal
By Qian Hong (Archer Hong Qian)
Dear readers and friends,
Trump is a major global phenomenon (as is Milei). Whether we criticize him harshly from a moral high ground or praise him blindly, such reactions often stem from either a failure to adapt (indirectly shaped by ideological beliefs) or a form of adaptation (driven by direct, interested reasoning). Neither is commendable, nor should they be taken as a model.
In facing such world-shaking events, we need explanations that are both historically grounded and logically sound. My essay on "On Billionaires Governing Nations" is merely an attempt—within the framework of what I call Symbionomics（共生经济学）, or symbiotic economics. I sincerely welcome your thoughts and critiques. I’d love to hear your insights!
Abstract
“Governance by the wealthy” is not a continuation of the old Globalization 2.0 narrative of capital domination, but rather an experimental pathway responding to the paradigm shift in 21st-century governance. It is grounded in the market efficiency and organizational responsibility inherent in Globalization 3.0’s intersubjective symbiosis, and incorporates the GDE-based Golden Ratio of Economic Health from Symbionomics（共生经济学） as a normative standard for evaluating policies oriented toward the future—whose initial outlines are now beginning to surface and will be gradually revealed in the following analysis.
This paper proposes a new theoretical construct — Symbionomics — under the paradigm of “Symbiotic Rights.” It breaks beyond the “Wealth of Nations” logic of classical economics and the “free will” logic of Austrian economics by emphasizing human physical, psychological, and spiritual health, and advocating for lifestyle reinvention. Its core tenets are:
Production serves life → Life manifests ecology → Ecology releases living.
I. The Health Golden Ratio: A Five-Factor Interaction Model in Symbionomics
Symbionomics is centered on human health as the ultimate goal of policy and institutional design. It introduces a tripartite model —
Cost / Benefit / Health —
and expands it into a five-factor interaction system, incorporating:
The health value of a policy is calculated as:
Health Value = (C ÷ E) × H × T × P
Each factor is benchmarked at a neutral value of 1.0. Values above 1.0 represent positive structural contribution; values below 1.0 indicate system tension. This model evaluates whether policies and systems can reduce cost, empower people, enhance health, build trust, and maintain peace — in a compound, multiplicative structure.
It applies to evaluating not only national governance, but also cities, corporations, international relations, public opinion surveys, and urban communities — making it a universal “governance health check-up” tool.
II. Structural Evaluation of Trump's Six Core Policies Using the Health Golden Ratio
This model is applied to assess the six core fiscal policies implemented by the Trump administration:
DOGE Efficiency Department
(Department of Government Efficiency): Uses big data and technology to streamline governance processes and cut institutional costs.Tariff Negotiation Leverage (Short-Term Revenue)
By adjusting tariffs, it temporarily increases national income while positioning the U.S. advantageously in trade negotiations.Tax Reduction Policy (Income + Consumption)
Reduces overall tax burden, stimulates entrepreneurship, and boosts domestic consumption, enhancing economic vitality.Trump Green Card (High-End Immigration Capitalization)
Selling 7 million green cards at $5 million each generates $35 trillion, aiming to address U.S. debt while welcoming global high-net-worth individuals.Sovereign Fund
Established using tariff income and a small fee from government contracts, ensuring long-term fiscal security and national credibility.Deportation of Illegal Immigrants
Reduces social welfare burden, alleviates housing pressure, improves community safety, and strengthens social trust.
Each policy is evaluated using the five-factor model:
The composite health index is calculated based on weights assigned to each policy:
Policy | Weight |
DOGE | 25% |
Tariff | 15% |
Tax Cut | 20% |
Green Card | 20% |
Sovereign Fund | 10% |
Deportation | 10% |
The resulting weighted average health value is 85.1%, indicating high structural sustainability and coordination within the governance system. These policies work synergistically rather than independently — combining digital tools, trade negotiations, taxation, immigration capital, fiscal instruments, and social reform.
This forms a symbiotic governance system — not fragmented tactics but a coherent architecture of structural cooperation.
III. Visual Analysis: Health Value Bar Chart and Policy Structure Radar Chart
To more intuitively understand the structural performance of Trump’s six core policies under the Symbionomic model, two visual tools are used:
🔷 Left: Policy Health Value Bar Chart
X-axis: Six core policies
Y-axis: Health Value calculated from the model
The red dashed line represents the equilibrium benchmark of 1.0
Bars above 1.0 show positive contributions to structural balance and system health
DOGE (1.43) and Sovereign Fund (1.32) significantly outperform the benchmark, indicating strong integration capacity and institutional sustainability.
In contrast, Tariff (0.64) and Tax Cut (0.54) fall below the line, suggesting the need for compensatory mechanisms or structural optimization.
🔷 Right: Policy Structure Radar Chart
This shows each policy’s performance across the five factors:
Cost (C), Empowerment (E), Health (H), Trust (T), Peace (P)
Each policy creates a unique “structural profile”
DOGE scores high in Cost Reduction and Trust
Trump Green Card stands out in Empowerment and Peace
This differentiation highlights the system's internal complementarity and functional division
Together, the charts provide a clear visualization of policy orientation, effectiveness, and mutual synergy in shaping a resilient governance system.
IV. Global Credibility and Globalization 3.0
Trump’s immigration and trade policies are not only domestic strategies but also components of a broader global symbiotic economic logic. To fundamentally reduce illegal immigration, the U.S. must engage politically, economically, and militarily with origin countries — helping them move from disorder to order, from fragility to contract-based peace.
This is also vital for protecting the credibility of the U.S. dollar in the international system. As Trump stated at the 73rd United Nations General Assembly:
“We will never surrender American sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable global bureaucracy. We are governed by Americans. We reject the ideology of globalism and embrace the doctrine of patriotism.”
This echoes Ronald Reagan’s legacy. Every country, every region, and every leader is responsible for their people’s welfare. In a world increasingly governed by interactive balance, every society deserves to be great again.
Trump’s second-term strategy may thus include:
U.S.–Ukraine Mineral Infrastructure Pact
Secures resource supply and peacebuilding leverage.U.S.–Europe Petrochemical Agreement
Enhances energy independence and reduces Russian leverage.U.S.–Russia Resource Agreement
Shifts confrontation to cooperation, stabilizing global energy flows.U.S.–China Welfare Trade Adjustment
Aims to rebalance trade, stabilize China’s transition, and prevent a collapse.Indo-Pacific Peace Strategy
Supports regional security through development cooperation.North American “Zero-Zero-Zero” Framework
Promotes economic integration with zero tariffs, subsidies, and barriers.Global Symbiosis Pact
Proposes a new contract based on intersubjective interaction and symbiotic value generation.MindsNetworking Project
Just as the Internet solved information asymmetry and the Internet of Things linked machines, MindsNetworking aims to build cognitive infrastructure — resolving misunderstanding and enabling transparent governance.
This is Globalization 3.0, no longer capital-driven, but built on interconnected, balanced, symbiotic collaboration.
V. The Trust Structure of Good Governance: "Do More, Speak Wisely"
Within the Health Golden Ratio model, Trust (T) is not just legal legitimacy — it also includes transparency, explainability, and public participation. These qualities lower social transaction costs and marginal efficiency costs, which enhances health, happiness, and dignity.
This is the gateway to good governance.
In an era of cognitive warfare and disinformation, Trump's international strategy often emphasizes “strategic clarity with tactical ambiguity” — a way to act more, speak less, and maintain flexibility. As the saying goes:
"Sometimes ambiguity protects more than clarity distorts."
Domestically, however, it’s the opposite: Governance must speak clearly and consistently. Whether it's Commerce Secretary Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Bessent, or tech communicator Elon Musk, all have shown the importance of storytelling. Through friendly language and vivid examples, they can explain the structure and logic of fiscal policy, winning public understanding and building trust.
For example:
How will tax policy raise national reserves and citizen wealth simultaneously?
Why can the sovereign fund ensure pensions for the next 30 years?
This is called “trust through storytelling.” Trust is not just built through law or contracts, but through human dialogue, empathy, and narrative clarity.
Governance must be “both salt and light.”
Salt: maintaining discipline and standards.
Light: illuminating public understanding.
Governance is not a closed-door mechanism, but a transparent, intersubjective symbiotic structure.
This is the essence of “governance by the wealthy” — it combines reason, structure, and narrative.
It doesn't mean money rules. It means those with system-thinking and organizational experience contribute transparently and responsibly.
VI. Trump: From Intuitive Governance to Paradigm Innovation
Trump’s governance style has often been dismissed as intuitive, unorthodox, even chaotic. However, behind it lies two profound dynamics:
Systemic Necessity, and
Paradigm Transition.
The phrase “capitalist” — historically used as a slur by socialist critique — has long lost its meaning. As contemporary understanding shows:
“Exploitation is not caused by capital, but by collusion between power and capital.”
If capital is no longer tied to power — if it can operate transparently, focus on efficiency, and contribute wisely to public systems, it becomes a force for structural good.
“Governance by the wealthy” is not oligarchy. It is not the rule of the rich, but the application of entrepreneurial tools, market logic, and organizational experience to public service. Its goal is not wealth, but efficiency, transparency, and responsibility.
Symbionomics argues that all policies and institutions should undergo health-value analysis:
Health Value = (C ÷ E) × H × T × P
Only those policies that genuinely reduce cost, empower people, strengthen trust, and increase peace and well-being should be sustained. This is not about the strong dominating the weak — it is about decentralizing power through systemic design, and building a symbiotic governance paradigm.
Conclusion
Under the Symbionomics framework, the Trump administration’s six core policies scored a composite Health Value of 85.1% — a result that suggests internal coherence, structural balance, and high resilience.
This stands in contrast to the elite failure described in David Halberstam’s The Best and the Brightest, where brilliance led to blind spots, and to the outdated “flat world” optimism of Thomas Friedman and the Globalization 2.0 camp.
The Symbionomic Paradigm of Globalization 3.0 is not about conquest or competition — it is about interdependence, interaction, and innovation.
It is governance with vitality, with humanity, and with integrity.
Vancouver, March 23–27, 2025
参考文献 References
1. Wittgenstein:《逻辑哲学论》（Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus）
2.Peter Thiel：ZERO TO ONE-Notes On Startups，Or How To Build The Future
3.Michael Polanyt: Personal Knowledge—Towards Post-Critical Philosophy
4.George Soros: Open Society：Reforming Global Capitalism
5.Archer Hong Qian:《SYMBIOSISM·共生——The Mind Power to Agree on An Innovative Lifestyle·一种约定创新生活方式的精神力量》，Onebook Press，CANADA，2021
6. 钱 宏主编：《全球共生：化解冲突重建世界秩序的中国学派》Global Symbiosism：Chinese School of Defusing Clashes and Rebuilding the World Order，晨星出版社，2018
7.《全球化3.0价值观：从重集体理念，到重个体生命——Transform of Trust组织平台，从降本赋能开始》，http://symbiosism.com.cn/9768.html
8. 钱 宏：《GDE生態价值参量的理论框架——再论新国民“生产-交换-生活”账户核算体系》（Theoretical Framework of GDE Ecological Value Parameters — Revisiting the Accounting System for the New National Accounts of Production, Exchange, and Living），《经济要参》2017，http://symbiosism.com.cn/3018.html
9.钱 宏：《和解的年代：从共产主义到共生主义》（The Reconciliation Time：From Communism to Symbiosism）,Published & Printed in Hong Kong,2007
10. David Halberstam：The Best and the Brightest中译本《出类拔萃之辈》
11. 《共生经济学（Symbionomics）21世纪人类政治经济组织行为的经济学因应之道》，Onebook Press，CANADA，2023，http://symbiosism.com.cn/7695.html共生经济学原创稿件（2008-2025）
12. 共生权：经济学叙事的范式转移（The Symbiorights：a Paradigm shift in Economic narrative），http://symbiosism.com.cn/5861.html
13. From the U.S.-Ukraine Mineral Agreement to the U.S.-Europe Petrochemical Agreement: A Strategic Transition，http://symbiosism.com.cn/9644.html
14. Archer Hong Qian:《共生：联合国叙事的典范转移》The Symbiosism: a Paradigm shift in UN narrative，http://symbiosism.com.cn/5898.html
15.《重申“终结乌克兰战争的第三条道路”（Reaffirming "The Third Path to Ending the War in Ukraine"）》， http://symbiosism.com.cn/9487.html
16.《川普新政Trump's New Deal——共生经济学：成本效率、游戏规则、资孞创价，及其时空意间》， http://symbiosism.com.cn/8977.html
17. Archer Hong Qian：《大格局、大使命、大智慧——写于Trump当选第47任美国总统当日》， http://symbiosism.com.cn/8893.html
18. 祝福川普总统（Blessings for President Trump），http://symbiosism.com.cn/9375.html