遍地“张献忠”？(bilingual)Why so many
矢板明夫说三道四，现在的中国为何遍地“张献忠”？(bilingual 双语) Yaita Akio talks about this and that. Why is there so many "Zhang Xianzhong" in China now?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyF1x0wwTkA
美国之音中文网
Nov 18, 2024
近来珠海、无锡等地接连发生无差别杀人的恶性报复社会事件，被称为“张献忠现象”。其原因有，社会不满的声音没有渠道发泄、共产党多年灌输的仇恨教育、政府丧失了处理问题的手段。矢板明夫说三道四，为您深入解读。
https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTAxNjk3
@长征组歌 11 hours ago
怎样评价89.64？
中国红旗网 百家争鸣 贺春生 2016-9-4
64运动的积极方面是反邓、反腐败，反官倒。是文化大革命以后由大学生发起的既有文革的形式，又有资产阶级民主宪政内容的小资产阶级革命性质的政治运动。
尤其是它的后期，明显的被美国西化派、自由派，颜色革命所控制。
这也是邓小平后期借用所谓四项基本原则残酷血腥镇压学生运动的一个理由。学生运动来势很猛，矛头是直指邓氏集团的。邓小平绝不允许文化大革命重演，必须得把这场运动镇压下去。经过相当长的时间的预谋，学生运动组织内部在大量混进西化派分子参与和主导的情况下，后期其性质明显的带有颜色革命的特点。这也是邓小平准备镇压学生运动，所事先安插的或与美国串通，利用西化派民主势力的派遣与明显渗透的配合，为镇压这次学生运动找到的借口。
美国在利用颜色革命搞垮别的国家的时候，并不是一概都推翻这个国家的现政权的（对于特色中国的处理方式就是如此），而是在政治、军事、经济、文化等领域实施全面的高压并加之和平演变的技俩使之完全屈从的情况下与现政权在非常隐蔽的频繁接触中，随时权衡着是与这个国家共建和保持一种逼奸和交媾的奴役关系，经济利益来得更容易些，还是推翻现政权重建一个新的傀儡政权为美国输送的经济利益来得更容易些。所以，64运动后期，美国默许了邓小平的法西斯血腥镇压学生运动的残暴计划，最后，边喊边退虚张声势的撤出了这场角斗。
89.64学生运动，就是这样的一锅夹生饭。在邓小平彻底投靠美国的前提下，美国决定保留特色伪共，这样既可以达到美国颠覆这个原本属于共产党领导的国家的目的，又可以使颠覆的成本降到最低，而利益却可以最大化。也就是说暂时可以不使用武力，就可以控制这个国家。用中国古典战法（孙子兵法）解释，这就叫“上兵伐谋（攻心为上）、其次伐交、其次伐兵、其下攻城”。
今天看来，这场斗争除了美国背后导演的外部因素以外，核心问题只不过是特色党内资产阶级这一派与那一派的争斗，也就是邓小平改开复辟的稳健派与赵紫阳等复辟倒退的自由派的争斗。实质上是一场统治阶级内部的饱狗和饿狗的争斗，台上狗和正在准备上台的台下狗的争斗。他们不论哪一方面取得胜利，与无产阶级和全国广大人民群众的根本利益都没有正面的关系。
今天的复辟现实，特色现在所走的道路，正是当年64运动的邓小平改开复辟的稳健派与赵紫阳等复辟倒退的自由派们所要走的同一的道路。他们的区别仅在于是早一天全面复辟资本主义走苏联解体的道路，还是不急于求成、用温水煮青蛙的办法，宁可晚一天但一定要稳妥的复辟带有中国特色的资本主义。
因为，邓小平复辟资本主义要的是求稳，要的是“摸着石头过河”，要的是“温水煮青蛙”，他不允许搞激变，怕翻船！而自由派，也就是激进派，是嫌复辟的进程太慢，急功近利，企图一夜变天，直接走西方民主宪政的资本主义道路。为了能够复辟成功和在权力争夺中稳操胜券，邓小平因此敢冒天下之大不韪，不惜动用坦克部队，借用军队中的嫡系力量对64学生运动进行了残酷的血腥镇压，对天安门广场进行了连资本主义国家也轻易不敢做的大屠杀和血洗。制造了震惊中外惨绝人寰的血案。邓小平老谋深算，一举平定了动乱，并为自己名正言顺的登台挂印铺平了道路。当然这都是在美国的或明或暗的策应下实现的。
今天的社会现实，特色现在所走的道路，正是当年64运动复辟倒退的自由派们所要走的道路。只不过是按照邓小平总设计的稳健方案进行的，而不是按照自由派或苏联戈尔巴乔夫式的激进方案进行的。40年来，他的阴谋暂时地得逞了。当今的一切政策和走向，都是邓小平总设计方案的继续，邓小平与江泽民、与胡锦涛，与习近平的关系，只不过是接力棒的关系，传承的关系，继续的关系。在这条复辟资本主义的道路上，他们只是20步和30步的关系，50步和100步的关系，是由特色社会主义过渡到特色资本主义，再由特色自由资本主义过渡到特色垄断资本主义直到今天的特色官僚权贵资产阶级法西斯主义的几个过程。
这正验证了毛主席当年的预言：“修正主义上台，就是资本主义上台，而且是最坏的资本主义，是法西斯主义。”
所以，当年的64运动，实际上并没有多少积极的革命意义，更没有象有些人所说的那样是无产阶级文化大革命的继续。当时许多人看不清这个问题，这是可以理解的。但是在今天，我们无产阶级和全国人民，特别是有一定的阶级斗争和政治斗争觉悟，有一定的马列毛主义理论认知的革命者，就一定要看清这个问题，决不能被错误的舆论所利用，再犯政治上的幼稚的低级错误。
然而，“共产党人到处支持一切反对现存的社会制度和政治制度的革命运动。”（《共产党宣言》285页）而且，共产党人还坚持无产阶级要有自己的革命运动。这个运动就是消灭私有制，推翻资产阶级专政，建立无产阶级专政，重新实现社会主义。并且还要坚持：“他们的目的，只有用暴力推翻全部现存的社会制度，才能达到。”（《共产党宣言》285页）的这条唯一正确的根本途径！
Translation
https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTAxNjk3
Yaita Akio talks about this and that. Why is there so many "Zhang Xianzhong" in China now?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyF1x0wwTkA
Voice of America Chinese Network
Nov 18, 2024
Recently, Zhuhai, Wuxi and other places have successively experienced vicious social revenge incidents of indiscriminate killings, which are called the "Zhang Xianzhong phenomenon". The reasons include that there is no channel for the voices of social dissatisfaction to vent, the Communist Party has been instilling hatred education for many years, and the government has lost the means to deal with problems. Yaita Akio talks about this and that, and gives you an in-depth interpretation.
@长征组歌 11 hours ago
How do you evaluate 89.64?
China Red Flag Network Hundred Schools of Thought He Chunsheng 2016-9-4
The positive aspects of the 64 movement are anti-Deng, anti-corruption, and anti-official corruption. It is a petty-bourgeois revolutionary political movement initiated by college students after the Cultural Revolution, which has both the form of the Cultural Revolution and the content of bourgeois democratic constitutionalism.
Especially in its later period, it was obviously controlled by the Westernization faction, liberals, and color revolutions in the United States.
This was also a reason for Deng Xiaoping to use the so-called four basic principles to brutally and bloodily suppress the student movement in the later period. The student movement was very fierce, and the spearhead was directly aimed at the Deng group. Deng Xiaoping would never allow the Cultural Revolution to happen again, and this movement must be suppressed. After a long period of premeditation, with a large number of Westernization factions participating and leading the student movement organization, its nature in the later period was obviously characterized by color revolution. This was also Deng Xiaoping's preparation to suppress the student movement, and he arranged it in advance or colluded with the United States, using the dispatch of Westernization faction democratic forces and the obvious infiltration to find an excuse to suppress this student movement.
When the United States uses color revolutions to bring down other countries, it does not overthrow the current regime of the country in general (this is how it handles China with special characteristics). Instead, it implements comprehensive high pressure in the political, military, economic, and cultural fields, and uses the technique of peaceful evolution to make it completely submissive. In very covert and frequent contacts with the current regime, it weighs at any time whether it is easier to build and maintain a slave relationship of rape and copulation with the country, or to overthrow the current regime and rebuild a new puppet regime to deliver economic benefits to the United States. Therefore, in the late stage of the June 4th Movement, the United States acquiesced to Deng Xiaoping's brutal plan of fascist bloody suppression of the student movement, and finally withdrew from the fight with a bluff while shouting and retreating.
The June 4th student movement in 1989 was such a half-cooked meal. Under the premise that Deng Xiaoping completely surrendered to the United States, the United States decided to retain the special pseudo-communism, so that it could achieve the goal of subverting the country originally led by the Communist Party, and minimize the cost of subversion, while maximizing the benefits. In other words, it can control the country without using force for the time being. To explain it in the Chinese classical tactics (Sun Tzu's Art of War), this is called "the best strategy is to attack the enemy's mind (attacking the enemy's heart is the best), the next best is to attack the enemy's alliances, the next best is to attack the enemy's troops, and the worst is to attack the enemy's city".
Today, apart from the external factors directed by the United States, the core issue of this struggle is nothing more than a struggle between one faction of the bourgeoisie within the party with characteristics, that is, a struggle between the conservative faction of Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up and the liberal faction of restoration and regression such as Zhao Ziyang. In essence, it is a struggle between the well-fed dogs and the hungry dogs within the ruling class, and between the dogs on the stage and the dogs off the stage who are preparing to take the stage. No matter which side they win, it has no positive relationship with the fundamental interests of the proletariat and the broad masses of the people across the country.
Today's restoration reality, the path that the characteristics are taking now, is exactly the same path that the conservative faction of Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up and restoration and the liberal faction of restoration and regression such as Zhao Ziyang wanted to take in the June 4th Movement. The difference between them is that they would rather restore capitalism one day earlier and follow the path of the Soviet Union's disintegration, or not rush for success and use the method of boiling frogs in warm water, and would rather restore capitalism with Chinese characteristics one day later but steadily.
Because Deng Xiaoping's restoration of capitalism requires stability, "crossing the river by feeling the stones", and "boiling frogs in warm water". He does not allow radical changes for fear of capsizing! The liberals, that is, the radicals, think that the restoration process is too slow, and they are eager for quick success and instant benefits. They attempt to change the world overnight and directly follow the capitalist path of Western democratic constitutionalism. In order to restore successfully and win the power struggle, Deng Xiaoping dared to risk the world's disapproval and did not hesitate to use tank troops and borrow the direct forces of the army to carry out a brutal and bloody suppression of the 1989 student movement, and carried out a massacre and bloodbath in Tiananmen Square that even capitalist countries dare not do easily. It created a bloodbath that shocked China and the world. Deng Xiaoping was very shrewd and shrewd. He put down the turmoil in one fell swoop and paved the way for his legitimate accession to the throne. Of course, this was achieved with the overt or covert support of the United States.
Today's social reality, the path that the characteristics of China are taking now is exactly the path that the liberals who wanted to restore and regress in the June 4th Movement wanted to take. It's just that it is carried out according to the prudent plan designed by Deng Xiaoping, rather than the radical plan of the liberals or the Soviet Union Gorbachev. For 40 years, his conspiracy has temporarily succeeded. All current policies and trends are the continuation of the plan designed by Deng Xiaoping. The relationship between Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao, and Xi Jinping is just a baton relationship, a relationship of inheritance, and a relationship of continuation. On this road to the restoration of capitalism, they are only 20 steps and 30 steps, 50 steps and 100 steps. It is a few processes of transition from socialism with Chinese characteristics to capitalism with Chinese characteristics, and then from free capitalism with Chinese characteristics to monopoly capitalism with Chinese characteristics until today's bureaucratic and powerful bourgeois fascism with Chinese characteristics.
This just proves Chairman Mao's prediction: "When revisionism comes to power, capitalism comes to power, and the worst kind of capitalism is fascism."
Therefore, the June 4th Movement did not actually have much positive revolutionary significance, nor was it a continuation of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution as some people say. It is understandable that many people did not see this issue clearly at that time. But today, we, the proletariat and the people of the whole country, especially revolutionaries who have a certain level of class struggle and political struggle awareness and a certain level of Marxist-Leninist-Maoist theoretical cognition, must see this issue clearly and must not be used by erroneous public opinion to make na?ve and low-level political mistakes again.
However, "Communists support all revolutionary movements against the existing social and political systems everywhere." (The Communist Manifesto, page 285) Moreover, the Communists insist that the proletariat must have its own revolutionary movement. This movement is to eliminate private ownership, overthrow the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, establish the dictatorship of the proletariat, and re-realize socialism. And we must also insist on the only correct and fundamental path: "Their goal can only be achieved by violently overthrowing all existing social systems." (The Communist Manifesto, page 285)