再论川普的阻击型门罗主义——一月“马”,二月“哈”,入局出局,一念之差!

作者:孞烎Archer
发表时间:
+-

再论川普的阻击型门罗主义

Revisiting Trump's Defensive Monroe Doctrine

——一月“马”,二月“哈”,入局出局,一念之差!

—January "Ma," February "Kha," Entering the game, exiting the game, A single mind can solve the problem!

钱宏(Archer Hong Qian)

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation(CANADA)

2026年3月2日凌晨于Vancouver心约开关居

摘要

本文基于2025年美国《国家安全战略》(NSS)的分析框架,首次提出的“阻击型门罗主义”(DMD)的概念,旨在阐释川普(Donald Trump)总统回归后美国战略的本质转变,将如何影响世界秩序的重构。阻击型门罗主义,将传统门罗主义从防御性禁区意识转化为主动跨境干预机制,强调通过预防性攻击和精准斩首行动维护价值观念、地缘政治以及生活方式版块。作者认为,这一转变正孕育着全球化3.0的示范效应,标志着世界秩序从政治正确“普惠制”,向是非分明“会员制”的规则重构。文章从灵活现实主义视角深化剖析,论证其为美国在多极化世界中的动态平衡策略,并进一步探讨其在化解冲突重建世界秩序方面的时代意义,即从支配性“主权国家秩序”向交互主体“共生国家秩序”的转变(Transformation)。

引言

2026年注定是一个不平凡的年份。如果说,新年第3天美国就越境抓捕南美国家委内瑞拉总统马杜罗,虽然令人不可思议,但尚可用门罗主义来加以解释,那么,2月最后一天团灭了远在中东的大国伊朗政教合一最高领袖哈梅内伊及其高级将领们,门罗主义就无法自圆其说了。

在《国运的转捩点——简评2025美国〈国家安全战略〉》一文中,笔者分析了NSS战略重构的核心——灵活现实主义(Flexible Realism),并据此提出“阻击型门罗主义”(Defensive Monroe Doctrine,DMD)的概念。该概念并非“唐罗主义”(Donroe Doctrine),DMD是指一种运用预防性攻击或精准斩首行动,保卫或重塑价值观念、地缘政治、生活方式创新与再选择版块的国际和平市场秩序原则。该主义蕴含全球化3.0的示范效应,系邓小平“凡是和美国搞好关系的国家,都富为何起来了”命题的2.0版本,即从无善恶是非差异的政治正确“普惠制”转向是非善恶美丑鲜明的常识回归“会员制”规则重构。完全超越了“枪杆里出政权”或“选票里出政权”的旧时叙事。

概念界定

“阻击型门罗主义”系一复合概念,融合传统地缘政治势力范围理论与现代进攻性安全策略。其核心逻辑在于将原先防御性的“禁区”意识,转化为主动的、跨境的干预机制。DMD关键内涵可从以下三个维度剖析:

1、核心手段:从防御转向预防性清除

传统门罗主义强调“不许干涉我方势力范围”;阻击型版本则转向主动出击:

预防性攻击(Preemptive Strike):在威胁尚未完全成型(如敌对势力渗透、非对称武器部署)前,直接动用军事或准军事手段将其摧毁。

精准斩首(Targeted Decapitation):针对敌对阵营的关键决策者、意识形态核心人物或技术负责人进行精准定点清除,以极小物理代价实现对整个版块的动向的阻断。

2、捍卫对象:从领土转向版块价值

DMD理论不仅保卫地理边界,更维护以下三个深层版块:

价值观念(Ideological Bloc):确保特定版块内的意识形态(如自由民主、宗教传统或特定社会契约)不被外部异质文明或政治形态侵蚀。

地缘政治(Geopolitical Bloc):维持关键战略支点(如能源通道、半导体链条)的绝对控制权,排斥外部竞争对手。

生活方式(Lifestyle Bloc):保护特定消费模式、金融结算体系(如美元/数字货币体系)以及数据隐私标准,将其视为生存权的延伸。

3、目标意图:保卫与重塑并行

保卫:建立“免疫系统”,通过定点打击外部渗透,维持既有版块的纯粹性与稳定性。

改变(Regime/System Change):当邻近版块或关键节点出现可能威胁本版块利益的偏移时,通过阻击手段强制重启其政治或和平市场逻辑。

理论框架:灵活现实主义

阻击型门罗主义系灵活现实主义国际关系逻辑的体现。该主义认为,在多极化现代世界中,大国不仅需守护领土,更应通过“定点外科手术”式行动,在观念和生活方式隐形疆域上建立“拒止区”。灵活现实主义强调策略的弹性、目标的精准以及对动态平衡的追求,而非无差别的强权压制。

在《国运的转捩点》语境下,将阻击型门罗主义置于灵活现实主义框架内,其深刻性在于:它不再是一种僵化的、处处出击的霸权模式,而是一套基于“常识回归”与“文明契约”的筛选过滤系统。

深化剖析

在2025年NSS背景下,阻击型门罗主义不仅是对1823年原始门罗主义的数字化与实战化翻修,更是川普总统回归后,将“美利坚利益”与“全球版块治理”(即各国领导人对本国人民幸福生活负责)挂钩的终极手段。若传统门罗主义为“划出一道线,不许进来”,则川普时代的阻击型门罗主义则为“只要你可能威胁到我的逻辑,我随处可以降维打击”。

基于此,可从以下三个维度深化对“川普版阻击型门罗主义”的剖析:

1、进攻性防御:从离岸平衡到定点外科手术

川普的灵活现实主义核心在于不寻求大规模、旷日持久的全面战争,但保留极高频率、高强度的定点暴力。

手段的精准化:阻击型门罗主义不再动辄派遣数万地面部队,而是依赖高精尖科技,如无人机群、网络瘫痪(Cyber-Offensive)以及特种行动。其目的并非占领,而是“阻断”。

预防性门槛的降低:只要白宫认定某一地区的生活方式再选择(如转向去中心化贸易体系或非美金融协议)触及美国地缘政治底线,即便无物理攻击发生,美国亦可能发动“阻击”。

震慑效应:通过对关键节点(Key Nodes)的“精准斩首”(无论政治领袖抑或技术领袖),向整个版块传递“违反美国原则代价极高”的信号。

2、价值观念与生活方式的市场保护主义

“生活方式创新与再选择”系一种全新的视角。川普时代的阻击型门罗主义,实质上保护一套以美国为核心的“价值市场原则”:

零容忍性的标准竞争:若一版块试图通过数字威权、AI监控或非西方叙事建立新生活方式,川普政府将其视为对“美国版块”的直接入侵。

反向干预:过去系“推广民主”,如今系“阻击反美叙事”。该主义不再致力于将所有人转化为美国人,但绝对禁止任何可能替代美国生活方式的系统在全球市场(尤其是美洲和盟友版块)内成气候。

原则重塑:该主义赋予美国“国际城市警察”职能,利用精准打击确保全球市场规则不偏离基于法治的自由贸易与私有产权核心。

3、版块重组中的不确定性武器

在2026年后地缘格局中,川普利用阻击型门罗主义打破传统外交惯例。

维度

传统门罗主义

2025阻击型门罗主义

地理边界

仅限美洲(西半球)

全域化(数据、金融、深海、太空及关键供应链版块)

行动触发点

外部武力介入

内部选择偏移(如版块内国家试图切换意识形态或经济协议)

核心逻辑

维持现状(Status Quo)

动态清除(消除一切可能威胁美国版块优势的萌芽)

 

完善DMD展开维度

1、灵活现实主义下的精准阻击

在灵活现实主义指导下,阻击型门罗主义表现出极高的选择性:

不求全面覆盖,但求点穴精准:它不介入所有全球争端,而是根据“价值观念、地缘政治、生活方式”三大核心版块受损程度,灵活决定介入。

手段的非对称性:预防性攻击或精准斩首不再是战争序幕,而是替代大规模战争的“手术刀”。通过极低成本精准干预,维护国际和平市场原则稳定性,此乃“灵活”精髓。

2、全球化3.0:从泥沙俱下到是非分明

“全球化3.0示范效应”实质上是对过去三十年“无是非经济全球化(2.0)”的拨乱反正。

在“入局”还是“出局”的国别选择意义上,是非善恶美丑的常识回归:此系对邓小平“跟着美国都富了”命题的最深刻升级。在灵活现实主义看来,财富分配不再单纯系贸易额,而是“文明信用度”的红利,甚至是一种“自我淘汰”机制。

示范效应:该主义通过阻击“作恶者”和“秩序破坏者”,向世界证明:唯有建立在常识、法治与尊重“主权在民”个人选择基础上的市场(即“美丑分明”的秩序),方具可持续繁荣。它不仅是保卫,更在全球范围内树立“优胜劣汰”的文明示范。

3、国际市场原则的再选择版块

“生活方式创新与再选择版块”系极具前瞻性的论点:

保护选择权:阻击型门罗主义并非强加统一模式,而是通过阻击那些“试图剥夺他人选择权”的威权或垄断势力,保卫一种创新自由——在AI时代尤指思想自由。

会员制的本质:该会员制并非排他小圈子,而是以“常识”为入会申请。只要认同和平市场秩序与是非观念,履行协议权利责任即为会员。此灵活性使美国能迅速重组盟友关系,形成以价值为底色的动态联盟。

时代课题:化解冲突重建世界秩序

阻击型门罗主义不仅限于地缘战略调整,更涉及“化解冲突重建世界秩序”的国际关系时代课题,即从支配性“主权国家秩序”向交互主体“共生国家秩序”的转变。

支配性主权国家秩序系指,无论主权在官抑或主权在民的政权组织,只要得到多数国家承认,不管其在世界上扮演何种角色,哪怕造成世界分裂威胁和平,其主权均须得到无条件尊重。该秩序源于威斯特伐利亚体系,强调形式主权的绝对性,但忽略内部治理的正当性与合法性,导致威权政权通过国际承认维持对内压迫。

交互主体共生国家秩序则指,主权在民、维系国民个人生命自组织连接平衡的政权组织,在国际上有良善国家行为能力和影响,无论其国土大小国民多少,都是国际社会的平权成员!交互主体共生(Intersubjective Symbiosism)秩序,强调国家主权的合法性源于对人民福祉的责任,视国家为交互主体的共生网络,而非支配工具。

在此框架下,国家间关系基于共享价值与互惠原则,优先干预那些违背“主权在民”原则、威胁全球稳定的政权。

2026年初的实战案例凸显此转变:1月3日,美国发动“绝对决心行动”(Operation Absolute Resolve),捕获委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其妻,并移交纽约法院审判,罪名为毒品恐怖主义阴谋与可卡因进口阴谋。 此行动导致约75人死亡,包括32名古巴特种部队成员,并引发委内瑞拉国内分裂——部分民众庆祝,另部分视之为“绑架”。随后,副总统Delcy Rodríguez接任代理总统,美国宣布监督委内瑞拉直至安全过渡,并解除石油贸易制裁,推动私有化。 2月28日,美国与以色列联合导弹打击,成功暗杀伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊。伊朗宣布40天全国哀悼期,但国内反应两极:支持者哀悼集会,反对者街头庆祝(包括海外伊朗社区),甚至呼吁回归前王朝。

马杜罗与哈梅内伊代表对本国人民不负责任的极端政权领导人,前者导致委内瑞拉经济崩溃与人道危机,后者通过宗教极端主义压制异见、牺牲经济发展与自由。这些干预系阻击型门罗主义的应用,标志着从无条件主权尊重向基于人民福祉的交互秩序转型,推动全球化3.0下是非分明的世界重建。

正所谓一月“马”,二月“哈”,入局出局,一念之差!

结论:国运转捩点上的利剑

在《国运的转捩点》中提出的DMD概念,恰如其分捕捉2025年美国战略本质转变:美国已从“秩序维护者”转变为“版块捍卫者”。阻击型门罗主义具极强不可预测性,使对手无法通过传统军备竞赛应对,因打击可能源于金融制裁、网络斩首或针对关键人物的物理清除,其目的高度聚焦于“保护美国主导的市场逻辑和生活选择”。

在2025 NSS分析中,作者认为阻击型门罗主义系美国经历长期“政治正确”导致战略迷茫后,回归的“有原则的生存哲学”。它标志着美国不再通过“大水漫灌”式援助维持虚假和平,而是通过“灵活阻击”清除破坏和平市场逻辑的毒瘤,从而在“全球化3.0”中实现更高维度的公平与繁荣。

DMD完美阐释为何这不仅是地缘政治博弈,更是一场“文明与常识”的重新归位。该概念构成了深刻的学术与政论切口。

 

参考文献:

Archer Hong Qian:《国运的转捩点——简评2025美国〈国家安全战略〉》(重要附录:《白皮书White Paper:重构全球化3.0战略洞察与行动指南 Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0》)http://symbiosism.com.cn/11246.html

Archer Hong Qian:再说“入局”,还是“出局”?——全球化3.0门槛边的一次文明选择》http://symbiosism.com.cn/11470.html

Archer Hong Qian:《从平等主体承诺,到交互主体共生》http://symbiosism.com.cn/9287.html

钱宏主编:《全球共生:化解冲突重建世界秩序的中国学派》Global Symbiosism:Chinese School of Defusing Clashes and Rebuilding the World Order,晨星出版社,2018

Archer Hong Qian:《SYMBIOSISM·共生——The Mind Power to Agree on An Innovative Lifestyle·一种约定创新生活方式的精神力量》,Onebook Press,CANADA,2021。电子版https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B096PYNP8H/ref=cm_sw_r_u_apa_glt_0KRJY15HME8AAT3ABCV7);

 

Archer Hong Qian:《共生:联合国叙事的典范转移》The Symbiosism: a Paradigm shift in UN narrative,http://symbiosism.com.cn/5898.html

 

作者简介

  宏Archer Hong Qian

一个从中国大地上生长出来的世界思行者/A World Citizen of Minds and Action, Rooted in Chinese Soil

《国学大师丛书》(1991-1996)总主编(国家八五重点工程),出版28卷本,并获得“第三届国家图书奖”/Chief Editor of Masters in Chinese and Western learning series(1991-1996)

《Touch·雙休日》杂志社社长、总编辑(2000-2011)/President and Editor-in-Chief of Touch Weekend Magazine (2000-2011)

中国作家恊会会员/A Member of the China Writers Association

新汉字艺术创作者/Creator of New Chinese Character Art

共生经济学创建者,并于2011年在人民大学一博士研究生班讲述共生经济学ABC / Founder of Symbionomics.In 2011, he lectured on the ABCs of Symbionomics in a doctoral program at Renmin University.

全球共生研究院·全球共生论坛(GSF)发起人(已经举办四届大论坛、七届小型论坛)/Institute for Global Symbiosism·Founder of the Global Symbiosism Forum (GSF)

复旦大学研究生院《现代危机与共生思想》课程教授/Professor of “Modern Crisis and Symbiosism” in Graduate School of Fudan University

全球共生学会(加拿大)学术委员会主席/Chairman of the Global Symbiosism Society(CANADA)Academic Committee

交互主体共生基金会(CANADA)发起人/Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation(CANADA)

呼吁举办“新达特茅斯会议:AI(1956)-AM(2026)”/Call to Convene the "New Dartmouth Conference: From AI (1956) to AM (2026)"  (AM:Amorsphia MindsFeild/Netwok)

电话:+1 604 690 6088;电邮:hongguanworld@gmal.com

 

 

Revisiting Trump's Defensive Monroe Doctrine

—January "Ma," February "Kha," Entering the game, exiting the game, A single mind can solve the problem!

By Archer Hong Qian(钱宏)

March 2, 2026, at dawn in Vancouver's Heart Agreement Switch Residence

 

Abstract

This article, based on the analytical framework of the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy (NSS), explores the concept of "Defensive Monroe Doctrine" (DMD) first proposed by the author in "The Turning Point of National Destiny—A Brief Review of the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy" (December 7, 2025). It aims to elucidate the essential transformation of U.S. strategy following President Trump's (Donald Trump) return and its impact on the reconstruction of world order. The Defensive Monroe Doctrine transforms the traditional Monroe Doctrine from a defensive exclusion zone consciousness into an active cross-border intervention mechanism, emphasizing the maintenance of ideological, geopolitical, and lifestyle blocs through preemptive strikes and targeted decapitations. The author argues that this transformation is fostering a demonstrative effect for Globalization 3.0, marking a rule reconstruction from politically correct "universal benefits" to a "membership system" with clear distinctions of right and wrong, good and evil, beauty and ugliness. The article deepens the analysis from the perspective of flexible realism, arguing that it serves as the U.S.'s dynamic balancing strategy in a multipolar world, and further discusses its contemporary significance in resolving conflicts and rebuilding world order, namely the transformation from a dominant "sovereign state order" to an intersubjective "symbiotic state order" (Transformation).

Introduction

2026 is destined to be an extraordinary year. If the U.S. cross-border capture of Venezuelan President Maduro in South America on the third day of the new year was astonishing but could still be explained by the Monroe Doctrine, then the elimination of Iran's supreme leader Khamenei and his senior generals in the distant Middle East on the last day of February cannot be justified by the Monroe Doctrine alone.

In "The Turning Point of National Destiny—A Brief Review of the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy," the author analyzed the core of NSS strategic reconstruction—Flexible Realism—and proposed the concept of "Defensive Monroe Doctrine" (DMD). This concept is not "Donroe Doctrine"; DMD refers to a principle that employs preemptive strikes or targeted decapitations to defend or reshape ideological, geopolitical, and lifestyle innovation and re-selection blocs in the international peaceful market order. This doctrine embodies the demonstrative effect of Globalization 3.0, representing version 2.0 of Deng Xiaoping's proposition that "all countries that maintain good relations with the United States become prosperous," shifting from a politically correct "universal benefits" without distinctions of good and evil, right and wrong, to a "membership system" rule reconstruction with clear distinctions of right and wrong, good and evil, beauty and ugliness. It completely transcends the old narratives of "power from the barrel of a gun" or "power from the ballot box."

Concept Definition

The "Defensive Monroe Doctrine" is a composite concept that integrates traditional geopolitical sphere of influence theory with modern offensive security strategies. Its core logic lies in transforming the originally defensive "exclusion zone" consciousness into an active, cross-border intervention mechanism. The key connotations of DMD can be analyzed from the following three dimensions:

  1. Core Means: From Defense to Preemptive Elimination The traditional Monroe      Doctrine emphasizes "no interference in our sphere of      influence"; the defensive version shifts to proactive strikes:

    • Preemptive Strike: Directly employing military or paramilitary means to destroy       threats before they fully form (such as enemy infiltration or asymmetric       weapon deployment).

    • Targeted Decapitation: Conducting precise targeted eliminations against       key decision-makers, ideological core figures, or technical leaders in       hostile camps, achieving blockade of the entire bloc's dynamics at       minimal physical cost.

  2. Objects of Defense: From Territory to Bloc Values This theory not only defends      geographical borders but also safeguards the following three deep-level      blocs:

    • Ideological Bloc: Ensuring that ideologies within specific blocs (such as liberal       democracy, religious traditions, or specific social contracts) are not       eroded by external heterogeneous civilizations or political forms.

    • Geopolitical Bloc: Maintaining absolute control over key strategic pivots (such as       energy corridors or semiconductor chains) and excluding external       competitors.

    • Lifestyle Bloc: Protecting specific consumption patterns, financial settlement       systems (such as the USD/digital currency system), and data privacy       standards, viewing them as extensions of survival rights.

  3. Objectives: Defense and Reshaping in Parallel

    • Defense: Establishing an "immune system" through targeted       strikes on external infiltrations to maintain the purity and stability of       existing blocs.

    • Change (Regime/System Change): When neighboring blocs or key       nodes show deviations that may threaten the interests of this bloc, using       defensive means to forcibly restart their political or peaceful market       logic.

Theoretical Framework: Flexible Realism

The Defensive Monroe Doctrine is an embodiment of flexible realism in international relations logic. This doctrine holds that in the multipolar modern world, great powers must not only guard their territories but also establish "denial zones" in the invisible domains of concepts and lifestyles through "precision surgical" actions. Flexible realism emphasizes strategic flexibility, precise targeting, and the pursuit of dynamic balance, rather than indiscriminate power suppression.

In the context of "The Turning Point of National Destiny," placing the Defensive Monroe Doctrine within the flexible realism framework reveals its profundity: it is no longer a rigid, all-out hegemonic model but a screening and filtering system based on "common sense return" and "civilizational contracts."

Deepened Analysis

In the 2025 NSS context, the Defensive Monroe Doctrine is not only a digital and practical renovation of the original 1823 Monroe Doctrine but also the ultimate means by which President Trump, upon his return, links "American interests" with "global bloc governance" (i.e., national leaders being responsible for their people's happy lives). If the traditional Monroe Doctrine is "drawing a line, no entry allowed," then Trump's Defensive Monroe Doctrine is "as long as you may threaten my logic, I can strike dimensionally anywhere."

Based on this, the analysis of "Trump's Defensive Monroe Doctrine" can be deepened from the following three dimensions:

  1. Offensive Defense: From Offshore Balancing to Precision Surgery Trump's flexible realism core      lies in avoiding large-scale, protracted full wars but retaining extremely      high-frequency, high-intensity precision violence.

    • Precision of Means: The Defensive Monroe Doctrine no longer deploys       tens of thousands of ground troops but relies on high-tech such as drone       swarms, cyber-offensives, and special operations. Its purpose is not       occupation but "blockade."

    • Lowering of Preemptive Thresholds: As long as the White House       determines that a region's lifestyle re-selection (such as shifting to       decentralized trade systems or non-U.S. financial protocols) touches U.S.       geopolitical red lines, the U.S. may launch "defenses" even       without physical attacks occurring.

    • Deterrence Effect: Through "targeted decapitations" of key nodes (whether       political or technical leaders), it sends a signal to the entire bloc       that "violating U.S. principles comes at an extremely high       cost."

  2. Market Protectionism for Ideological and Lifestyle Values "Lifestyle innovation      and re-selection" is a profoundly new perspective. Trump's Defensive      Monroe Doctrine essentially protects a set of "value market      principles" centered on the U.S.:

    • Zero-Tolerance Standard Competition: If a bloc attempts to       establish new lifestyles through digital authoritarianism, AI       surveillance, or non-Western narratives, the Trump administration views       it as a direct invasion of the "U.S. bloc."

    • Reverse Intervention: Previously "promoting democracy," now       "defending against anti-American narratives." This doctrine no       longer aims to turn everyone into Americans but absolutely prohibits any       system that could replace American lifestyles from taking hold in the       global market (especially in the Americas and allied blocs).

    • Principle Reshaping: This doctrine endows the U.S. with the role of       "international urban police," using precision strikes to ensure       global market rules do not deviate from the core of rule-of-law-based       free trade and private property rights.

  3. Uncertainty Weapon in Bloc Reorganization In the post-2026 geopolitical      landscape, Trump uses the Defensive Monroe Doctrine to break traditional      diplomatic conventions.

Comparative Analysis:

Dimension

Traditional Monroe Doctrine

2025 Defensive Monroe Doctrine

Geographical   Boundaries

Limited to   the Americas (Western Hemisphere)

Globalized   (data, finance, deep sea, space, and key supply chain blocs)

Action   Triggers

External   military intervention

Internal   selection deviations (such as countries within blocs attempting to switch   ideologies or economic protocols)

Core Logic

Maintain   status quo (Status Quo)

Dynamic   elimination (eradicating all buds that may threaten U.S. bloc advantages)

DMD Expansion Dimensions

  1. Precision Defense Under Flexible Realism Under flexible realism guidance, the Defensive      Monroe Doctrine exhibits extremely high selectivity:

    • Not Seeking Full Coverage, But Precision Acupuncture: It does not intervene in       all global disputes but flexibly decides intervention based on the degree       of damage to the three core blocs of "ideology, geopolitics,       lifestyle."

    • Asymmetry of Means: Preemptive strikes or targeted decapitations are no       longer preludes to war but "scalpels" replacing large-scale       wars. Maintaining the stability of international peaceful market       principles through ultra-low-cost precision interventions is the essence       of "flexibility."

  2. Globalization 3.0: From Mud and Sand Mixed to Clear Distinctions of      Right and Wrong The "Globalization 3.0 demonstrative effect" is      essentially a correction of the past thirty years' "non-judgmental      economic globalization (2.0)."

    • In the Sense of Country Selection for 'Inclusion' or 'Exclusion,'       the Return of Common Sense Distinctions of Right and Wrong, Good and       Evil, Beauty and Ugliness: This is the most profound upgrade of Deng       Xiaoping's proposition that "following America leads to       prosperity." In flexible realism's view, wealth distribution is no       longer merely trade volume but dividends of "civilizational credit."

    • Demonstrative Effect: This doctrine proves to the world through defending       against "evildoers" and "order destroyers" that only       markets built on common sense, rule of law, and respect for       "people's sovereignty" individual choices (i.e., "beauty       and ugliness distinct" order) possess sustainable prosperity. It is       not only defense but also establishes a "survival of the       fittest" civilizational demonstration globally.

  3. Re-Selection Blocs for International Market Principles "Lifestyle innovation      and re-selection blocs" is an extremely forward-looking argument:

    • Protecting Choice Rights: The Defensive Monroe Doctrine       does not impose a uniform model but defends an innovative       freedom—especially thought freedom in the AI era—by defending against       authoritarian or monopolistic forces that "attempt to deprive others       of choice rights."

    • Essence of Membership System: This membership system is not       an exclusive clique but uses "common sense" as the entry       application. As long as one acknowledges peaceful market order and       distinctions of right and wrong, fulfilling protocol rights and       responsibilities makes one a member. This flexibility enables the U.S. to       rapidly reorganize alliances, forming dynamic coalitions based on values.

Contemporary Topic: Resolving Conflicts and Rebuilding World Order

The Defensive Monroe Doctrine is not limited to geopolitical strategic adjustments but involves the international relations contemporary topic of "resolving conflicts and rebuilding world order," namely the transformation from a dominant "sovereign state order" to an intersubjective "symbiotic state order."

The dominant sovereign state order refers to any regime organization, whether sovereignty resides in officials or the people, as long as it is recognized by the majority of countries, regardless of its role in the world—even if it causes world division and threatens peace—its sovereignty must be unconditionally respected. This order originates from the Westphalian system, emphasizing the absoluteness of formal sovereignty but ignoring the legitimacy of internal governance, leading authoritarian regimes to maintain internal oppression through international recognition.

The intersubjective symbiotic state order refers to regime organizations where sovereignty resides in the people, maintaining the self-organizing connection balance of citizens' individual lives, possessing benign state behavior capabilities and influences internationally, and regardless of territorial size or population number, all are equal members of international society! The intersubjective symbiotic (Intersubjective Symbiosism) order emphasizes that the legitimacy of state sovereignty stems from responsibility for people's well-being, viewing states as symbiotic networks of intersubjects rather than tools of domination.

In this framework, interstate relations are based on shared values and reciprocal principles, prioritizing interventions against regimes that violate "people's sovereignty" principles and threaten global stability.

The practical cases in early 2026 highlight this transformation: On January 3, the U.S. launched "Operation Absolute Resolve," capturing Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife, and handing them over to New York courts for trial on charges of narco-terrorism conspiracy and cocaine importation conspiracy. This action resulted in about 75 deaths, including 32 Cuban special forces members, and triggered divisions in Venezuela—some citizens celebrated, others viewed it as "kidnapping." Subsequently, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez assumed the role of acting president, and the U.S. announced oversight of Venezuela until a safe transition, lifting oil trade sanctions to promote privatization. On February 28, the U.S. and Israel jointly launched missile strikes, successfully assassinating Iran's supreme leader Khamenei. Iran announced a 40-day national mourning period, but domestic reactions were polarized: supporters held mourning rallies, opponents (including overseas Iranian communities) celebrated in the streets, even calling for a return to the pre-dynasty.

Maduro and Khamenei represent extreme regime leaders irresponsible to their own people; the former caused Venezuela's economic collapse and humanitarian crisis, the latter suppressed dissent through religious extremism, sacrificing economic development and freedom. These interventions are applications of the Defensive Monroe Doctrine, marking the transition from unconditional sovereignty respect to an intersubjective order based on people's well-being, promoting a world reconstruction with clear distinctions of right and wrong under Globalization 3.0.

As the saying goes, January "Ma," February "Ha," inclusion or exclusion, a matter of a single thought!

Conclusion: The Sharp Sword at the Turning Point of National Destiny

The DMD concept proposed in "The Turning Point of National Destiny" aptly captures the essential transformation of U.S. strategy in 2025: The U.S. has shifted from an "order maintainer" to a "bloc defender." The Defensive Monroe Doctrine possesses extreme unpredictability, making opponents unable to respond through traditional arms races, as strikes may originate from financial sanctions, cyber decapitations, or physical eliminations of key figures, with purposes highly focused on "protecting U.S.-dominated market logic and lifestyle choices."

In the 2025 NSS analysis, the author believes the Defensive Monroe Doctrine is a "principled survival philosophy" to which the U.S. returns after long-term strategic confusion caused by "political correctness." It signifies that the U.S. no longer maintains false peace through "flood irrigation" aid but clears tumors destroying peaceful market logic through "flexible defenses," thereby achieving higher-dimensional fairness and prosperity in "Globalization 3.0."

DMD perfectly explains why this is not only a geopolitical game but also a repositioning of "civilization and common sense." This concept constitutes a profound academic and political commentary incision.

References:

Archer Hong Qian: "The Turning Point of National Destiny—A Brief Review of the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy" (Important Appendix: "White Paper: Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0") http://symbiosism.com.cn/11246.html

Archer Hong Qian: "Revisiting 'Inclusion' or 'Exclusion'?—A Civilizational Choice at the Threshold of Globalization 3.0" http://symbiosism.com.cn/11470.html

Archer Hong Qian: "From Equal Subject Commitments to Intersubjective Symbiosis" http://symbiosism.com.cn/9287.html

Qian Hong (ed.): "Global Symbiosism: Chinese School of Defusing Clashes and Rebuilding the World Order," Morning Star Press, 2018

Archer Hong Qian: "SYMBIOSISM·Symbiosis—The Mind Power to Agree on An Innovative Lifestyle·A Spiritual Force to Agree on Innovative Lifestyles," Onebook Press, CANADA, 2021. E-book https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B096PYNP8H/ref=cm_sw_r_u_apa_glt_0KRJY15HME8AAT3ABCV7;

Archer Hong Qian: "The Symbiosism: a Paradigm Shift in UN Narrative," http://symbiosism.com.cn/5898.html

Author Biography

Qian Hong Archer Hong Qian

A World Citizen of Minds and Action, Rooted in Chinese Soil

Chief Editor of "Masters in Chinese and Western Learning Series" (1991-1996) (National Eighth Five-Year Key Project), published in 28 volumes, and awarded the "Third National Book Award"/Chief Editor of “Masters in Chinese and Western learning series”(1991-1996)

President and Editor-in-Chief of Touch Weekend Magazine (2000-2011)/President and Editor-in-Chief of Touch Weekend Magazine (2000-2011)

A Member of the China Writer’s Association/A Member of the China Writer’s Association

Creator of New Chinese Character Art/Creator of New Chinese Character Art

Founder of Symbionomics, and in 2011 lectured on the ABCs of Symbionomics in a doctoral program at Renmin University/ Founder of Symbionomics.In 2011, he lectured on the ABCs of Symbionomics in a doctoral program at Renmin University.

Institute for Global Symbiosism·Founder of the Global Symbiosism Forum (GSF) (has held four major forums and seven small forums)/Institute for Global Symbiosism·Founder of the Global Symbiosism Forum (GSF)

Professor of “Modern Crisis and Symbiosism” in Graduate School of Fudan University/Professor of “Modern Crisis and Symbiosism” in Graduate School of Fudan University

Chairman of the Global Symbiosism Society(CANADA)Academic Committee/Chairman of the Global Symbiosism Society(CANADA)Academic Committee

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation(CANADA)/Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation(CANADA)

Call to Convene the "New Dartmouth Conference: From AI (1956) to AM (2026)" (AM: Amorphia MindsField/Network)/Call to Convene the "New Dartmouth Conference: From AI (1956) to AM (2026)" (AM: Amorphia MindsField/Network)

Phone: +1 604 690 6088; Email: hongguanworld@gmail.com