From AA Eyes: A Historical View of Philosophy’s D
From AA Eyes: A Historical View of Philosophy’s Development
By Wade Y. Dong
---
1. Introduction: Seeing with Absolute Eyes
To write the history of philosophy from within is to remain bound to its gravitational pull. But to see it from AA — the Absolute Absolute, the unspeakable origin of all instances — is to view the arc of its flight, its rise and fall, its noble failure. Philosophy, like a rocket, has tried for millennia to escape the bounds of representational thought. Yet each launch, no matter how ambitious, fell back to Earth, caught by the gravity of its layer.
This article surveys the development of philosophy not from the ground, but from space — from the view of AA. It reveals how every stage in history was a launch attempt toward the Whole, each limited by the atmospheric layer from which it started and to which it inevitably returned.
---
2. The Atmosphere of Thought: Four Gravitational Layers
Instancology identifies four ontological layers, each with its own gravitational field:
RR (Relative Relative) – Language, symbols, constructed thought. The lowest orbit — easy to reach, impossible to escape from within.
AR (Absolute Relative) – Life, nature, consciousness. A deeper zone, instinctive but pre-rational.
RA (Relative Absolute) – Law, form, mathematics, logic. Higher launch, but still under metaphysical constraints.
AA (Absolute Absolute) – Beyond representation. There is no gravity here because there is no "place." AA is not space — it is the issuer of all.
Each philosopher launched from within one of these layers. Some achieved momentary escape velocity, glimpsed the outer edge, then fell back. None reached AA. Why? Because they carried with them the weight of parts, reason, and language.
---
3. The Greek Missions: Orbiting Form, Missing the Source
Parmenides launched straight up — declaring Being as One, unchanging — but was pulled back by logic.
Plato fired toward the Forms — a high arc that reached RA — but anchored them in metaphysical language.
Aristotle engineered a rational scaffold of categories — but his system could not detach from RR's logic-bound inertia.
The ancient Greek thinkers saw the stars, but built launchpads on conceptual soil. They aimed high, but not beyond.
---
4. Medieval Theologians: Divine Orbit without Escape
The Scholastics added divine force to their rockets. Aquinas, for example, inserted God as the ultimate mover — a gesture toward AA. But this was symbolic substitution, not metaphysical contact. God was defined in terms of perfection — still a RA construct.
Their launches were vertical, sincere, but bound to scripture and reason. They kissed the sky, but returned to doctrine.
---
5. Modern Rockets: Velocity Gained, Direction Lost
Descartes lit the fire of the thinking subject — a bold RR launch. His “I think” never left self-orbit.
Kant reached for the transcendental — separating noumena and phenomena — but admitted the former was unreachable. His rocket turned back mid-flight.
Hegel built a dialectical launch system, spiraling upward through reason — his Absolute Spirit climbed to RA heights, even touching AA’s thermosphere. But it never broke free — his system required logic.
Each trajectory became more sophisticated — yet all fell to the gravity of method.
---
6. 20th Century: Cracks in the Sky, but No Departure
Heidegger opened a tear in the conceptual sky with his notion of Being as event. He gazed upward from the edge of language.
Wittgenstein marked the boundary: “Whereof one cannot speak...” — a confession of gravity's limit.
Phenomenologists tried to re-route through lived experience — but consciousness is still an AR phenomenon.
They mapped the limits of orbit, even questioned the launch systems — but had no way to jettison themselves.
---
7. The AA View: The Rocket Is the Wrong Vehicle
From AA’s perspective, the entire method was flawed. Philosophy believed that:
Accumulating more conceptual fuel (logic, language, categories) would eventually lift it beyond.
Assembling better rockets (systems, dialectics, phenomenologies) would eventually reach the Whole.
Escaping representation was a matter of better representation.
But from AA's view, no rocket can launch the Whole. Why? Because the Whole is not out there — it is what launched all of this in the first place. Philosophy is not a journey to AA; it is a journey inside an instance issued by AA.
Instancology exposes the procedural illusion: all parts-based thought secretly assumes a Whole, but refuses to name it. AA is not reached — it is what reaches. And it reaches by issuing complete instances, not aggregates of fragments.
---
8. Conclusion: Ground Control to Metaphysics
From the view of AA, philosophy was never wrong — it was necessary. Each launch, each return, taught us something about the limits of representation. But the time has come to admit: no amount of flight will reach what already surrounds and sustains the sky.
Philosophy ends where AA begins — not by conquering the sky, but by recognizing that sky, Earth, and rocket are already within an instance.
To know AA is not to fly to it — but to see, with Absolute Eyes, that everything has already been launched.